public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] dasd: use blk_drop_partitions instead of badly reimplementing it
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:28:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414072902.324936-7-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414072902.324936-1-hch@lst.de>

Use the blk_drop_partitions function instead of messing around with
ioctls that get kernel pointers.  For this blk_drop_partitions needs
to be exported, which it normally shouldn't - make an exception for
s390 only.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 block/partitions/core.c         |  4 ++++
 drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c | 20 ++++----------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
index deccc3fbcd37..8c5295ca8ea6 100644
--- a/block/partitions/core.c
+++ b/block/partitions/core.c
@@ -624,6 +624,10 @@ int blk_drop_partitions(struct block_device *bdev)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_S390
+/* for historic reasons in the DASD driver */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_drop_partitions);
+#endif
 
 static bool blk_add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev,
 		struct parsed_partitions *state, int p)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
index 7d079154f849..af5b0ecb8f89 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
@@ -143,9 +143,6 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
  */
 void dasd_destroy_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
 {
-	/* The two structs have 168/176 byte on 31/64 bit. */
-	struct blkpg_partition bpart;
-	struct blkpg_ioctl_arg barg;
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 
 	/*
@@ -155,19 +152,10 @@ void dasd_destroy_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
 	bdev = block->bdev;
 	block->bdev = NULL;
 
-	/*
-	 * See fs/partition/check.c:delete_partition
-	 * Can't call delete_partitions directly. Use ioctl.
-	 * The ioctl also does locking and invalidation.
-	 */
-	memset(&bpart, 0, sizeof(struct blkpg_partition));
-	memset(&barg, 0, sizeof(struct blkpg_ioctl_arg));
-	barg.data = (void __force __user *) &bpart;
-	barg.op = BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION;
-	for (bpart.pno = block->gdp->minors - 1; bpart.pno > 0; bpart.pno--)
-		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKPG, (unsigned long) &barg);
-
-	invalidate_partition(block->gdp, 0);
+	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	blk_drop_partitions(bdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+
 	/* Matching blkdev_put to the blkdev_get in dasd_scan_partitions. */
 	blkdev_put(bdev, FMODE_READ);
 	set_capacity(block->gdp, 0);
-- 
2.25.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14  7:28 more partition handling cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: refactor blkpg_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  8:09   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: pass a hd_struct to delete_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: cleanup hd_struct freeing Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: remove hd_struct_kill Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove the disk argument from blk_drop_partitions Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: don't call invalidate_partition " Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  8:12   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: simplify block device syncing in bdev_del_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: mark invalidate_partition static Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fold bdev_unhash_inode into invalidate_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 17:26 ` more partition handling cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-08 19:44 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 19:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] dasd: use blk_drop_partitions instead of badly reimplementing it Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414072902.324936-7-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox