public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hoeppner@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] s390/dasd: Store path configuration data during path handling
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 21:39:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002193940.24012-7-sth@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002193940.24012-1-sth@linux.ibm.com>

From: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>

Currently, the configuration data for a path is retrieved during a path
verification and used only temporarily. If a path is newly added to the
I/O setup after a boot, no configuration data will be stored for this
particular path.
However, this data is required for later use and should be present for
a valid I/O path anyway. Store this data during the path verification so
that newly added paths can provide all information necessary.

Reference-ID: IO1812
Signed-off-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
index 497aa81778b6..274f79869b7c 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
@@ -1263,9 +1263,10 @@ static void do_path_verification_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct dasd_uid *uid;
 	__u8 path_rcd_buf[DASD_ECKD_RCD_DATA_SIZE];
 	__u8 lpm, opm, npm, ppm, epm, hpfpm, cablepm;
+	struct dasd_conf_data *conf_data;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	char print_uid[60];
-	int rc;
+	int rc, pos;
 
 	data = container_of(work, struct path_verification_work_data, worker);
 	device = data->device;
@@ -1395,6 +1396,14 @@ static void do_path_verification_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			}
 		}
 
+		conf_data = kzalloc(DASD_ECKD_RCD_DATA_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (conf_data) {
+			memcpy(conf_data, data->rcd_buffer,
+			       DASD_ECKD_RCD_DATA_SIZE);
+		}
+		pos = pathmask_to_pos(lpm);
+		dasd_eckd_store_conf_data(device, conf_data, pos);
+
 		/*
 		 * There is a small chance that a path is lost again between
 		 * above path verification and the following modification of
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 19:39 [PATCH 00/10] DASD FC endpoint security Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] s390/cio: Export information about Endpoint-Security Capability Stefan Haberland
2020-10-06  9:46   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-06 14:23     ` Stefan Haberland
2020-10-06 14:37       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] s390/cio: Provide Endpoint-Security Mode per CU Stefan Haberland
2020-10-06 14:46   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-07 14:24     ` Stefan Haberland
2020-10-07 16:13       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] s390/cio: Add support for FCES status notification Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] s390/dasd: Remove unused parameter from dasd_generic_probe() Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] s390/dasd: Move duplicate code to separate function Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` Stefan Haberland [this message]
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 07/10] s390/dasd: Fix operational path inconsistency Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 08/10] s390/dasd: Display FC Endpoint Security information via sysfs Stefan Haberland
2020-10-06 10:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-06 16:57     ` Jan Höppner
2020-10-07  9:49       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-07 14:33         ` Jan Höppner
2020-10-07 16:40           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-07 20:10             ` Jan Höppner
2020-10-08  7:03               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-10-08 11:04                 ` Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 09/10] s390/dasd: Prepare for additional path event handling Stefan Haberland
2020-10-02 19:39 ` [PATCH 10/10] s390/dasd: Process FCES path event notification Stefan Haberland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201002193940.24012-7-sth@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox