From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: Fix inconsistent kobject removal
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118183009.43f5c037.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118165518.14578-2-sth@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:55:18 +0100
Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Our intention was to only remove path kobjects whenever a device is
> being set offline. However, one corner case was missing.
>
> If a device is disabled and enabled (using the IOCTLs BIODASDDISABLE and
> BIODASDENABLE respectively), the enabling process will call
> dasd_eckd_reload_device() which itself calls dasd_eckd_read_conf() in
> order to update path information. During that update,
> dasd_eckd_clear_conf_data() clears all old data and also removes all
> kobjects. This will leave us with an inconsistent state of path kobjects
> and a subsequent path verification leads to a failing kobject creation.
>
> Fix this by removing kobjects only in the context of offlining a device
> as initially intended.
>
> Fixes: 19508b204740 ("s390/dasd: Display FC Endpoint Security information via sysfs")
> Reported-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_devmap.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_int.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-18 16:55 [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd: fix kobject removal Stefan Haberland
2021-01-18 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: Fix inconsistent " Stefan Haberland
2021-01-18 17:30 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-01-25 14:55 ` Stefan Haberland
2021-01-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd: fix " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118183009.43f5c037.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox