From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
Tarun Gupta <targupta@nvidia.com>,
"Jason J . Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] vfio/ap_ops: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev()
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210504173027.74552e19.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <597b470b-6f19-4818-7cdd-92ca3683faae@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 3 May 2021 16:14:43 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 4/26/21 1:48 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:03:03 -0300
> > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This is straightforward conversion, the ap_matrix_mdev is actually serving
> >> as the vfio_device and we can replace all the mdev_get_drvdata()'s with a
> >> simple container_of().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++----------
> >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 2 +
> >> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> >>
> > (...)
> >
> >> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> >> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> >> {
> >> - struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
> >> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(&mdev->dev);
> >>
> >> - if (matrix_mdev->kvm)
> >> - return -EBUSY;
> >> + /* FIXME: Remove isn't allowed to fail */
> >> + if (WARN_ON(matrix_mdev->kvm))
> >> + return;
> > This is a pre-existing problem, but the rework now makes it more
> > obvious.
>
> I agree, I was not aware that returning a non-zero return code
> from this callback did not return the -EBUSY to userspace
> when the mdev is removed.
>
> >
> > Previously, the mdev code would only print a warning and then continue
> > with device removal, even if a ->remove() callback returned an error.
> > Now, it's quite clear that we'll end up in a weird half-dead state.
>
> With the latest kernel from our tree, the remove hangs until the
> guest is shutdown and the mdev fd is closed. During the hang, the
> dmesg log has the following:
>
> "No mdev vendor driver request callback support, blocked until released
> by user"
>
> So, it looks like nothing is done with the mdev until the fd for the
> mdev is closed when the guest is shut down, at which time the
> mdev is removed.
You probably want to wire up the request callback and notify userspace.
What happens today if the device in QEMU is removed via device_del?
Does that already clean up things properly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 23:02 [PATCH 00/12] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-23 23:02 ` [PATCH 01/12] vfio/mdev: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-24 0:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-04-26 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 19:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-04-23 23:03 ` [PATCH 06/12] vfio/ap_ops: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-26 17:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-26 18:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 23:41 ` Halil Pasic
2021-05-03 20:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-03 20:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-04 13:58 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-04 16:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-05 13:07 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-04 15:30 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-05-05 12:30 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-05-05 17:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-05 16:28 ` Tony Krowiak
2021-04-23 23:03 ` [PATCH 07/12] vfio/ccw: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-23 23:03 ` [PATCH 10/12] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev_parent_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-26 18:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 16:43 ` [PATCH 00/12] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-26 17:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 7:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-04-27 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210504173027.74552e19.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox