public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PULL 1/3] vfio-ccw: Check initialized flag in cp_init()
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:34:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210520113450.267893-2-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520113450.267893-1-cohuck@redhat.com>

From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>

We have a really nice flag in the channel_program struct that
indicates if it had been initialized by cp_init(), and use it
as a guard in the other cp accessor routines, but not for a
duplicate call into cp_init(). The possibility of this occurring
is low, because that flow is protected by the private->io_mutex
and FSM CP_PROCESSING state. But then why bother checking it
in (for example) cp_prefetch() then?

Let's just be consistent and check for that in cp_init() too.

Fixes: 71189f263f8a3 ("vfio-ccw: make it safe to access channel programs")
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20210511195631.3995081-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
index b9febc581b1f..8d1b2771c1aa 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
@@ -638,6 +638,10 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
 	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 1);
 	int ret;
 
+	/* this is an error in the caller */
+	if (cp->initialized)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	/*
 	 * We only support prefetching the channel program. We assume all channel
 	 * programs executed by supported guests likewise support prefetching.
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 11:34 [PULL 0/3] vfio-ccw: some fixes Cornelia Huck
2021-05-20 11:34 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-05-20 11:34 ` [PULL 2/3] vfio-ccw: Reset FSM state to IDLE inside FSM Cornelia Huck
2021-05-20 11:34 ` [PULL 3/3] vfio-ccw: Serialize FSM IDLE state with I/O completion Cornelia Huck
2021-05-26 22:33 ` [PULL 0/3] vfio-ccw: some fixes Vasily Gorbik
2021-05-27  6:33   ` b4 usage (was: [PULL 0/3] vfio-ccw: some fixes) Cornelia Huck
2021-05-27 15:25     ` Vasily Gorbik
2021-05-27 16:00       ` b4 usage Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210520113450.267893-2-cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox