public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] s390: preempt: Fix preempt_count initialization
Date: Wed,  7 Jul 2021 17:33:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210707163338.1623014-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> (raw)

S390's init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) doesn't actually let us initialize the
preempt_count of the requested CPU's idle task: it unconditionally writes
to the current CPU's. This clearly conflicts with idle_threads_init(),
which intends to initialize *all* the idle tasks, including their
preempt_count (or their CPU's, if the arch uses a per-CPU preempt_count).

Unfortunately, it seems the way s390 does things doesn't let us initialize
every possible CPU's preempt_count early on, as the pages where this
resides are only allocated when a CPU is brought up and are freed when it
is brought down.

Let the arch-specific code set a CPU's preempt_count when its lowcore is
allocated, and turn init_idle_preempt_count() into an empty stub.

Fixes: f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 16 ++++------------
 arch/s390/kernel/setup.c        |  1 +
 arch/s390/kernel/smp.c          |  1 +
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
index 23ff51be7e29..d9d5350cc3ec 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -29,12 +29,6 @@ static inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 				  old, new) != old);
 }
 
-#define init_task_preempt_count(p)	do { } while (0)
-
-#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu)	do { \
-	S390_lowcore.preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
-} while (0)
-
 static inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 	__atomic_and(~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
@@ -88,12 +82,6 @@ static inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 	S390_lowcore.preempt_count = pc;
 }
 
-#define init_task_preempt_count(p)	do { } while (0)
-
-#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu)	do { \
-	S390_lowcore.preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
-} while (0)
-
 static inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 }
@@ -130,6 +118,10 @@ static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z196_FEATURES */
 
+#define init_task_preempt_count(p)	do { } while (0)
+/* Deferred to CPU bringup time */
+#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu)	do { } while (0)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
 extern void preempt_schedule(void);
 #define __preempt_schedule() preempt_schedule()
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
index 5aab59ad5688..382d73da134c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ static void __init setup_lowcore_dat_off(void)
 	lc->br_r1_trampoline = 0x07f1;	/* br %r1 */
 	lc->return_lpswe = gen_lpswe(__LC_RETURN_PSW);
 	lc->return_mcck_lpswe = gen_lpswe(__LC_RETURN_MCCK_PSW);
+	lc->preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED;
 
 	set_prefix((u32)(unsigned long) lc);
 	lowcore_ptr[0] = lc;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index 111909aeb8d2..1fb483e06a64 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_lowcore(struct pcpu *pcpu, int cpu)
 	lc->br_r1_trampoline = 0x07f1;	/* br %r1 */
 	lc->return_lpswe = gen_lpswe(__LC_RETURN_PSW);
 	lc->return_mcck_lpswe = gen_lpswe(__LC_RETURN_MCCK_PSW);
+	lc->preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED;
 	if (nmi_alloc_per_cpu(lc))
 		goto out_stack;
 	lowcore_ptr[cpu] = lc;
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-07 16:33 Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-07-08 14:17 ` [PATCH] s390: preempt: Fix preempt_count initialization Heiko Carstens
2021-07-08 14:19   ` Vasily Gorbik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-07 19:42 Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210707163338.1623014-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox