From: Guvenc Gulce <guvenc@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net/smc: fix wait on already cleared link
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:05:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809090557.3121288-2-guvenc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809090557.3121288-1-guvenc@linux.ibm.com>
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
There can be a race between the waiters for a tx work request buffer
and the link down processing that finally clears the link. Although
all waiters are woken up before the link is cleared there might be
waiters which did not yet get back control and are still waiting.
This results in an access to a cleared wait queue head.
Fix this by introducing atomic reference counting around the wait calls,
and wait with the link clear processing until all waiters have finished.
Move the work request layer related calls into smc_wr.c and set the
link state to INACTIVE before calling smcr_link_clear() in
smc_llc_srv_add_link().
Fixes: 15e1b99aadfb ("net/smc: no WR buffer wait for terminating link group")
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guvenc Gulce <guvenc@linux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_core.h | 2 ++
net/smc/smc_llc.c | 10 ++++------
net/smc/smc_tx.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
net/smc/smc_wr.c | 10 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 6d6fd1397c87..64d86298e4df 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct smc_link {
unsigned long *wr_tx_mask; /* bit mask of used indexes */
u32 wr_tx_cnt; /* number of WR send buffers */
wait_queue_head_t wr_tx_wait; /* wait for free WR send buf */
+ atomic_t wr_tx_refcnt; /* tx refs to link */
struct smc_wr_buf *wr_rx_bufs; /* WR recv payload buffers */
struct ib_recv_wr *wr_rx_ibs; /* WR recv meta data */
@@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ struct smc_link {
struct ib_reg_wr wr_reg; /* WR register memory region */
wait_queue_head_t wr_reg_wait; /* wait for wr_reg result */
+ atomic_t wr_reg_refcnt; /* reg refs to link */
enum smc_wr_reg_state wr_reg_state; /* state of wr_reg request */
u8 gid[SMC_GID_SIZE];/* gid matching used vlan id*/
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index 273eaf1bfe49..2e7560eba981 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -888,6 +888,7 @@ int smc_llc_cli_add_link(struct smc_link *link, struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry)
if (!rc)
goto out;
out_clear_lnk:
+ lnk_new->state = SMC_LNK_INACTIVE;
smcr_link_clear(lnk_new, false);
out_reject:
smc_llc_cli_add_link_reject(qentry);
@@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ int smc_llc_srv_add_link(struct smc_link *link)
goto out_err;
return 0;
out_err:
+ link_new->state = SMC_LNK_INACTIVE;
smcr_link_clear(link_new, false);
return rc;
}
@@ -1286,10 +1288,8 @@ static void smc_llc_process_cli_delete_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
del_llc->reason = 0;
smc_llc_send_message(lnk, &qentry->msg); /* response */
- if (smc_link_downing(&lnk_del->state)) {
- if (smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk_del, false))
- smc_wr_tx_wait_no_pending_sends(lnk_del);
- }
+ if (smc_link_downing(&lnk_del->state))
+ smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk_del, false);
smcr_link_clear(lnk_del, true);
active_links = smc_llc_active_link_count(lgr);
@@ -1805,8 +1805,6 @@ void smc_llc_link_clear(struct smc_link *link, bool log)
link->smcibdev->ibdev->name, link->ibport);
complete(&link->llc_testlink_resp);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&link->llc_testlink_wrk);
- smc_wr_wakeup_reg_wait(link);
- smc_wr_wakeup_tx_wait(link);
}
/* register a new rtoken at the remote peer (for all links) */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 289025cd545a..c79361dfcdfb 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int smc_tx_rdma_writes(struct smc_connection *conn,
/* Wakeup sndbuf consumers from any context (IRQ or process)
* since there is more data to transmit; usable snd_wnd as max transmit
*/
-static int smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
+static int _smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
{
struct smc_cdc_producer_flags *pflags = &conn->local_tx_ctrl.prod_flags;
struct smc_link *link = conn->lnk;
@@ -550,6 +550,22 @@ static int smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
return rc;
}
+static int smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
+{
+ struct smc_link *link = conn->lnk;
+ int rc = -ENOLINK;
+
+ if (!link)
+ return rc;
+
+ atomic_inc(&link->wr_tx_refcnt);
+ if (smc_link_usable(link))
+ rc = _smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(conn);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&link->wr_tx_refcnt))
+ wake_up_all(&link->wr_tx_wait);
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int smcd_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
{
struct smc_cdc_producer_flags *pflags = &conn->local_tx_ctrl.prod_flags;
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_wr.c b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
index cbc73a7e4d59..a419e9af36b9 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_wr.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
@@ -322,9 +322,12 @@ int smc_wr_reg_send(struct smc_link *link, struct ib_mr *mr)
if (rc)
return rc;
+ atomic_inc(&link->wr_reg_refcnt);
rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(link->wr_reg_wait,
(link->wr_reg_state != POSTED),
SMC_WR_REG_MR_WAIT_TIME);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&link->wr_reg_refcnt))
+ wake_up_all(&link->wr_reg_wait);
if (!rc) {
/* timeout - terminate link */
smcr_link_down_cond_sched(link);
@@ -566,10 +569,15 @@ void smc_wr_free_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
return;
ibdev = lnk->smcibdev->ibdev;
+ smc_wr_wakeup_reg_wait(lnk);
+ smc_wr_wakeup_tx_wait(lnk);
+
if (smc_wr_tx_wait_no_pending_sends(lnk))
memset(lnk->wr_tx_mask, 0,
BITS_TO_LONGS(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT) *
sizeof(*lnk->wr_tx_mask));
+ wait_event(lnk->wr_reg_wait, (!atomic_read(&lnk->wr_reg_refcnt)));
+ wait_event(lnk->wr_tx_wait, (!atomic_read(&lnk->wr_tx_refcnt)));
if (lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr) {
ib_dma_unmap_single(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr,
@@ -728,7 +736,9 @@ int smc_wr_create_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
memset(lnk->wr_tx_mask, 0,
BITS_TO_LONGS(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT) * sizeof(*lnk->wr_tx_mask));
init_waitqueue_head(&lnk->wr_tx_wait);
+ atomic_set(&lnk->wr_tx_refcnt, 0);
init_waitqueue_head(&lnk->wr_reg_wait);
+ atomic_set(&lnk->wr_reg_refcnt, 0);
return rc;
dma_unmap:
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 9:05 [PATCH net 0/2] net/smc: fixes 2021-08-09 Guvenc Gulce
2021-08-09 9:05 ` Guvenc Gulce [this message]
2021-08-09 9:05 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net/smc: Correct smc link connection counter in case of smc client Guvenc Gulce
2021-08-09 10:00 ` [PATCH net 0/2] net/smc: fixes 2021-08-09 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210809090557.3121288-2-guvenc@linux.ibm.com \
--to=guvenc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox