From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 1/2] KVM: s390: Enable specification exception interpretation
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 08:01:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210829060121.16702-2-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210829060121.16702-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
When this feature is enabled the hardware is free to interpret
specification exceptions generated by the guest, instead of causing
program interruption interceptions.
This benefits (test) programs that generate a lot of specification
exceptions (roughly 4x increase in exceptions/sec).
Interceptions will occur as before if ICTL_PINT is set,
i.e. if guest debug is enabled.
There is no indication if this feature is available or not and the
hardware is free to interpret or not. So we can simply set this bit and
if the hardware ignores it we fall back to intercept 8 handling.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20210706114714.3936825-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com/
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 8925f3969478..118d5450c523 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
__u8 fpf; /* 0x0060 */
#define ECB_GS 0x40
#define ECB_TE 0x10
+#define ECB_SPECI 0x08
#define ECB_SRSI 0x04
#define ECB_HOSTPROTINT 0x02
__u8 ecb; /* 0x0061 */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index f72f361d39dd..5b45c83ced21 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3180,6 +3180,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_SRSI;
if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 73))
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_TE;
+ if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
+ vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_SPECI;
if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8) && vcpu->kvm->arch.use_pfmfi)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_PFMFI;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 4002a24bc43a..acda4b6fc851 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -510,6 +510,8 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
prefix_unmapped(vsie_page);
scb_s->ecb |= ECB_TE;
}
+ /* specification exception interpretation */
+ scb_s->ecb |= scb_o->ecb & ECB_SPECI;
/* branch prediction */
if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 82))
scb_s->fpf |= scb_o->fpf & FPF_BPBC;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-29 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-29 6:01 [GIT PULL 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix and feature for 5.15 Christian Borntraeger
2021-08-29 6:01 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-08-29 6:01 ` [GIT PULL 2/2] KVM: s390: index kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_idx Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-06 10:35 ` [GIT PULL 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix and feature for 5.15 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210829060121.16702-2-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox