public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: fix sk_refcnt underflow on linkdown and fallback
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:02:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110070234.60527-1-dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

We got the following WARNING when running ab/nginx
test with RDMA link flapping (up-down-up).
The reason is when smc_sock fallback and at linkdown
happens simultaneously, we may got the following situation:

__smc_lgr_terminate()
 --> smc_conn_kill()
    --> smc_close_active_abort()
           smc_sock->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED
           sock_put(smc_sock)

smc_sock was set to SMC_CLOSED and sock_put() been called
when terminate the link group. But later application call
close() on the socket, then we got:

__smc_release():
    if (smc_sock->fallback)
        smc_sock->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED
        sock_put(smc_sock)

Again we set the smc_sock to CLOSED through it's already
in CLOSED state, and double put the refcnt, so the following
warning happens:

refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 860 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x8d/0xf0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 5 PID: 860 Comm: nginx Not tainted 5.10.46+ #403
Hardware name: Alibaba Cloud Alibaba Cloud ECS, BIOS 8c24b4c 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x8d/0xf0
Code: 05 5c 1e b5 01 01 e8 52 25 bc ff 0f 0b c3 80 3d 4f 1e b5 01 00 75 ad 48

RSP: 0018:ffffc90000527e50 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff8881300df2c0 RCX: 0000000000000027
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813bd58040 RDI: ffff88813bd58048
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffff8881300df2c0 R11: ffffc90000527c78 R12: ffff8881300df340
R13: ffff8881300df930 R14: ffff88810b3dad80 R15: ffff8881300df4f8
FS:  00007f739de8fb80(0000) GS:ffff88813bd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000a01b008 CR3: 0000000111b64003 CR4: 00000000003706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 smc_release+0x353/0x3f0
 __sock_release+0x3d/0xb0
 sock_close+0x11/0x20
 __fput+0x93/0x230
 task_work_run+0x65/0xa0
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xf9/0x100
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

This patch adds check in __smc_release() to make
sure we won't do an extra sock_put() and set the
socket to CLOSED when its already in CLOSED state.

Fixes: 51f1de79ad8e (net/smc: replace sock_put worker by socket refcounting)
Signed-off-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 0cf7ed2f5d41..59284da9116d 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -149,14 +149,18 @@ static int __smc_release(struct smc_sock *smc)
 		sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
 		sk->sk_shutdown |= SHUTDOWN_MASK;
 	} else {
-		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN && sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT)
-			sock_put(sk); /* passive closing */
-		if (sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
-			/* wake up clcsock accept */
-			rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR);
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
+			if (sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+			    sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT)
+				sock_put(sk); /* passive closing */
+			if (sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
+				/* wake up clcsock accept */
+				rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock,
+							  SHUT_RDWR);
+			}
+			sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
+			sk->sk_state_change(sk);
 		}
-		sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
-		sk->sk_state_change(sk);
 		smc_restore_fallback_changes(smc);
 	}
 
-- 
2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-10  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-10  7:02 Dust Li [this message]
2021-11-10 13:14 ` [PATCH net] net/smc: fix sk_refcnt underflow on linkdown and fallback Karsten Graul
2021-11-10 14:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211110070234.60527-1-dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox