From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:33:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401123321.1714489-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401123321.1714489-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Add a test for SIGP STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS order.
There are several cases to cover:
- when neither vector nor guarded-storage facility is available, check
the order is rejected.
- when one of the facilities is there, test the order is rejected and
adtl_status is not touched when the target CPU is running or when an
invalid CPU address is specified. Also check the order is rejected
in case of invalid alignment.
- when the vector facility is there, write some data to the CPU's
vector registers and check we get the right contents.
- when the guarded-storage facility is there, populate the CPU's
guarded-storage registers with some data and again check we get the
right contents.
To make sure we cover all these cases, adjust unittests.cfg to run the
test with both guarded-storage and vector facility off and on. In TCG, we don't
have guarded-storage support, so we just run with vector facility off and on.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/vector.h | 16 ++
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/adtl-status.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 25 +++
4 files changed, 453 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
create mode 100644 s390x/adtl-status.c
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ee48bfa65070
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/vector.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Vector facility related defines and functions
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#ifndef _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
+#define _ASMS390X_VECTOR_H_
+
+#define VEC_REGISTER_NUM 32
+#define VEC_REGISTER_SIZE 16
+
+#endif
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 53b0fe044fe7..867d261622b6 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/edat.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
diff --git a/s390x/adtl-status.c b/s390x/adtl-status.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c3ecdbc35a9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/adtl-status.c
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Tests sigp store additional status order
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/sigp.h>
+#include <asm/vector.h>
+
+#include <smp.h>
+#include <gs.h>
+
+static int testflag = 0;
+
+#define INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS -4711
+
+struct mcesa_lc12 {
+ uint8_t vregs[0x200]; /* 0x000 */
+ uint8_t reserved200[0x400 - 0x200]; /* 0x200 */
+ struct gs_cb gs_cb; /* 0x400 */
+ uint8_t reserved420[0x800 - 0x420]; /* 0x420 */
+ uint8_t reserved800[0x1000 - 0x800]; /* 0x800 */
+};
+
+static struct mcesa_lc12 adtl_status __attribute__((aligned(4096)));
+
+static uint8_t expected_vec_contents[VEC_REGISTER_NUM][VEC_REGISTER_SIZE];
+
+static struct gs_cb gs_cb;
+static struct gs_epl gs_epl;
+
+static bool memisset(void *s, int c, size_t n)
+{
+ uint8_t *p = s;
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ if (p[i] != c) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void wait_for_flag(void)
+{
+ while (!testflag)
+ mb();
+}
+
+static void set_flag(int val)
+{
+ mb();
+ testflag = val;
+ mb();
+}
+
+static void test_func(void)
+{
+ set_flag(1);
+}
+
+static bool have_adtl_status(void)
+{
+ return test_facility(133) || test_facility(129);
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status(void)
+{
+ uint32_t status = -1;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status");
+
+ if (!have_adtl_status()) {
+ report_skip("no guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ report_prefix_push("running");
+ smp_cpu_restart(1);
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE, "status = INCORRECT_STATE");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("invalid CPU address");
+
+ cc = sigp(INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+ report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("unaligned");
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status + 256, &status);
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, "status = INVALID_PARAMETER");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_unavail(void)
+{
+ uint32_t status = 0;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status unavailable");
+
+ if (have_adtl_status()) {
+ report_skip("guarded-storage or vector facility installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ report_prefix_push("not accepted");
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status, &status);
+
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INVALID_ORDER,
+ "status = INVALID_ORDER");
+ report(memisset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status)),
+ "additional status not touched");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void restart_write_vector(void)
+{
+ uint8_t *vec_reg;
+ /* vlm handles at most 16 registers at a time */
+ uint8_t *vec_reg_16_31 = &expected_vec_contents[16][0];
+ uint64_t cr0, cr0_mask = ~(1ULL << CTL0_VECTOR);
+ int one = 1;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VEC_REGISTER_NUM; i++) {
+ vec_reg = &expected_vec_contents[i][0];
+ /* i+1 to avoid zero content */
+ memset(vec_reg, i + 1, VEC_REGISTER_SIZE);
+ }
+
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_VECTOR);
+
+ asm volatile (
+ " .machine z13\n"
+ /* load vector registers */
+ " vlm 0,15, %[vec_reg_0_15]\n"
+ " vlm 16,31, %[vec_reg_16_31]\n"
+ /* turn off vector instructions */
+ " stctg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
+ " ng %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
+ " stg %[cr0_mask], %[cr0]\n"
+ " lctlg 0,0, %[cr0]\n"
+ /* inform CPU 0 we are done by setting testflag to 1 */
+ " st %[one], %[testflag]\n"
+ /*
+ * infinite loop. function epilogue will restore floating point
+ * registers and hence destroy vector register contents
+ */
+ "0: j 0\n"
+ : [cr0_mask] "+&d"(cr0_mask)
+ : [vec_reg_0_15] "Q"(expected_vec_contents),
+ [vec_reg_16_31] "Q"(*vec_reg_16_31),
+ [cr0] "Q"(cr0),
+ [testflag] "T"(testflag),
+ [one] "d"(one)
+ : "v0", "v1", "v2", "v3", "v4", "v5", "v6", "v7", "v8", "v9",
+ "v10", "v11", "v12", "v13", "v14", "v15", "v16", "v17", "v18",
+ "v19", "v20", "v21", "v22", "v23", "v24", "v25", "v26", "v27",
+ "v28", "v29", "v30", "v31", "cc", "memory"
+ );
+}
+
+static void cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
+{
+ struct psw new_psw;
+
+ smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
+
+ new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_vector;
+
+ set_flag(0);
+
+ smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
+
+ wait_for_flag();
+}
+
+static int adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ assert (!lc || (lc >= 10 && lc <= 12));
+
+ if (lc <= 10 && !memisset(&adtl_status.gs_cb, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.gs_cb)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved200, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved200)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved420, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved420)))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!memisset(adtl_status.reserved800, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status.reserved800)))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ uint32_t status = -1;
+ struct psw psw;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
+
+ if (!test_facility(133) && lc) {
+ report_skip("not supported, no guarded-storage facility");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ cpu_write_magic_to_vector_regs(1);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+
+ report(!memcmp(adtl_status.vregs,
+ expected_vec_contents, sizeof(expected_vec_contents)),
+ "additional status contents match");
+
+ report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
+ "no write outside expected fields");
+
+ /*
+ * To avoid the floating point/vector registers being cleaned up, we
+ * stopped CPU1 right in the middle of a function. Hence the cleanup of
+ * the function didn't run yet and the stackpointer is messed up.
+ * Destroy and re-initalize the CPU to fix that.
+ */
+ smp_cpu_destroy(1);
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
+ smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_vector(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status vector");
+
+ if (!test_facility(129)) {
+ report_skip("vector facility not installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(0);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(10);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(11);
+ __store_adtl_status_vector_lc(12);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void restart_write_gs_regs(void)
+{
+ const unsigned long gs_area = 0x2000000;
+ const unsigned long gsc = 25; /* align = 32 M, section size = 512K */
+
+ ctl_set_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
+
+ gs_cb.gsd = gs_area | gsc;
+ gs_cb.gssm = 0xfeedc0ffe;
+ gs_cb.gs_epl_a = (uint64_t) &gs_epl;
+
+ load_gs_cb(&gs_cb);
+
+ set_flag(1);
+
+ ctl_clear_bit(2, CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE);
+
+ /*
+ * Safe to return here. r14 will point to the endless loop in
+ * smp_cpu_setup_state.
+ */
+}
+
+static void cpu_write_to_gs_regs(uint16_t cpu_idx)
+{
+ struct psw new_psw;
+
+ smp_cpu_stop(cpu_idx);
+
+ new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)restart_write_gs_regs;
+
+ set_flag(0);
+
+ smp_cpu_start(cpu_idx, new_psw);
+
+ wait_for_flag();
+}
+
+static void __store_adtl_status_gs(unsigned long lc)
+{
+ uint32_t status = 0;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_pushf("LC %lu", lc);
+
+ cpu_write_to_gs_regs(1);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ memset(&adtl_status, 0xff, sizeof(adtl_status));
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_ADDITIONAL_STATUS,
+ (unsigned long)&adtl_status | lc, &status);
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+
+ report(!memcmp(&adtl_status.gs_cb, &gs_cb, sizeof(gs_cb)),
+ "additional status contents match");
+
+ report(adtl_status_check_unmodified_fields_for_lc(lc),
+ "no write outside expected fields");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_store_adtl_status_gs(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("store additional status guarded-storage");
+
+ if (!test_facility(133)) {
+ report_skip("guarded-storage facility not installed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ __store_adtl_status_gs(11);
+ __store_adtl_status_gs(12);
+
+out:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ struct psw psw;
+ report_prefix_push("adtl_status");
+
+ if (smp_query_num_cpus() == 1) {
+ report_skip("need at least 2 cpus for this test");
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Setting up the cpu to give it a stack and lowcore */
+ psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ psw.addr = (unsigned long)test_func;
+ smp_cpu_setup(1, psw);
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+ test_store_adtl_status_unavail();
+ test_store_adtl_status_vector();
+ test_store_adtl_status_gs();
+ test_store_adtl_status();
+ smp_cpu_destroy(1);
+
+done:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index 1600e714c8b9..2159ba679519 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -136,3 +136,28 @@ file = firq.elf
timeout = 20
extra_params = -smp 1,maxcpus=3 -cpu qemu -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=2 -device qemu-s390x-cpu,core-id=1
accel = tcg
+
+[adtl-status-kvm]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = kvm
+extra_params = -cpu host,gs=on,vx=on
+
+[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-kvm]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = kvm
+extra_params = -cpu host,gs=off,vx=off
+
+[adtl-status-tcg]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = tcg
+# no guarded-storage support in tcg
+extra_params = -cpu qemu,vx=on
+
+[adtl-status-no-vec-no-gs-tcg]
+file = adtl-status.elf
+smp = 2
+accel = tcg
+extra_params = -cpu qemu,gs=off,vx=off
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 12:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Nico Boehr
2022-04-01 12:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
2022-04-12 11:21 ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-01 12:33 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-04-06 13:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: add test for SIGP STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-11 13:23 ` Nico Boehr
2022-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-12 15:20 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Add tests for SIGP store adtl status Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401123321.1714489-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox