From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 25/38] s390/preempt: disable __preempt_count_add() optimization for PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 09:49:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220530134924.1936816-25-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530134924.1936816-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 63678eecec57fc51b778be3da35a397931287170 ]
gcc 12 does not (always) optimize away code that should only be generated
if parameters are constant and within in a certain range. This depends on
various obscure kernel config options, however in particular
PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES can trigger this compile error:
In function ‘__atomic_add_const’,
inlined from ‘__preempt_count_add.part.0’ at ./arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:50:3:
./arch/s390/include/asm/atomic_ops.h:80:9: error: impossible constraint in ‘asm’
80 | asm volatile( \
| ^~~
Workaround this by simply disabling the optimization for
PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES, since the kernel will be so slow, that this
optimization won't matter at all.
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
index 23a14d187fb1..1aebf09fbcd8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -50,10 +50,17 @@ static inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
static inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
{
- if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127))
- __atomic_add_const(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
- else
- __atomic_add(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
+ /*
+ * With some obscure config options and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
+ * enabled, gcc 12 fails to handle __builtin_constant_p().
+ */
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)) {
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127)) {
+ __atomic_add_const(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ __atomic_add(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
}
static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
--
2.35.1
parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20220530134924.1936816-1-sashal@kernel.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220530134924.1936816-25-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox