From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] vfio/mdev: remove an extra parent kobject reference
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:38:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706143833.GD693670@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706074219.3614-16-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:42:19AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The mdev_type already holds a reference to the parent through
> mdev_types_kset, so drop the extra reference.
I would drop this patch, but at least the explanation needs tweaking..
kobj's are weird things, they have a kobj.parent, but the refcount for
that is dropped during kobject_del() and parent is NULL'd. vs this
reference which is being put back at kobject release.
So, the extra kset reference isn't contributing more protection - when
mdev_unregister_device() calls kset_unregister() it still has a valid
reference on the parent from the caller.
If this change is safe it is because no accesses to mdev->parent are
happening after mdev_unregister_device() returns, due to things like
the sysfs attribute fencing and the mdev_unreg_sem fencing child
devices. I didn't check everything, but it seems believable it could
be true.
I also suggest this patch should NULL mdev_type->parent during
unregister_device as the kobj stuff does, so any use after unregister
but before release could be crash, we generally shouldn't leave
unref'd pointers floating around.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 7:42 simplify the mdev interface v5 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915/gvt: fix a memory leak in intel_gvt_init_vgpu_types Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915/gvt: simplify vgpu configuration management Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-07 2:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 03/15] vfio/mdev: make mdev.h standalone includable Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 04/15] vfio/mdev: embedd struct mdev_parent in the parent data structure Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 13:29 ` Kirti Wankhede
2022-07-07 3:08 ` Eric Farman
2022-07-07 7:22 ` Vineeth Vijayan
2022-07-07 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 05/15] vfio/mdev: simplify mdev_type handling Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 13:31 ` Kirti Wankhede
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 06/15] vfio/mdev: remove mdev_from_dev Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 07/15] vfio/mdev: unexport mdev_bus_type Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 08/15] vfio/mdev: remove mdev_parent_dev Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 09/15] vfio/mdev: remove mtype_get_parent_dev Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 10/15] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the device_api sysfs into the core code Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 11/15] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the name " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the available_instance " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 13/15] vfio/mdev: consolidate all the description " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 14/15] vfio/mdev: add mdev available instance checking to the core Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 13:37 ` Kirti Wankhede
2022-07-07 3:08 ` Eric Farman
2022-07-08 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 15/15] vfio/mdev: remove an extra parent kobject reference Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 13:48 ` Kirti Wankhede
2022-07-07 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 14:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-07-07 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-07 23:01 ` Alex Williamson
2022-07-07 2:19 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220706143833.GD693670@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox