From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:26:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220920142639.29b1bdc2.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909102247.67324-16-kevin.tian@intel.com>
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:22:47 +0800
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>
> and replace kref. With it a 'vfio-dev/vfioX' node is created under the
> sysfs path of the parent, indicating the device is bound to a vfio
> driver, e.g.:
>
> /sys/devices/pci0000\:6f/0000\:6f\:01.0/vfio-dev/vfio0
>
> It is also a preparatory step toward adding cdev for supporting future
> device-oriented uAPI.
>
> Add Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-vfio-dev.
>
> Also take this chance to rename chardev 'vfio' to 'vfio-group' in
> /proc/devices.
What's the risk/reward here, is this just more aesthetically pleasing
symmetry vs 'vfio-dev'? The char major number to name association in
/proc/devices seems pretty obscure, but what due diligence have we done
to make sure this doesn't break anyone? Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 10:22 [PATCH v3 00/15] Tidy up vfio_device life cycle Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] vfio: Add helpers for unifying " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 8:23 ` Ethan Zhao
2022-09-09 8:42 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-09 23:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] vfio/pci: Use the new device life cycle helpers Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] vfio/mlx5: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] vfio/hisi_acc: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] vfio/mdpy: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] vfio/mtty: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-20 19:17 ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-20 22:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] vfio/mbochs: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] drm/i915/gvt: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] vfio/ap: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] vfio/fsl-mc: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] vfio/platform: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] vfio/amba: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] vfio/ccw: " Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] vfio: Rename vfio_device_put() and vfio_device_try_get() Kevin Tian
2022-09-09 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] vfio: Add struct device to vfio_device Kevin Tian
2022-09-20 20:26 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2022-09-20 22:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-21 16:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-22 5:18 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220920142639.29b1bdc2.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=abhsahu@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox