public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] iommu/s390: Add I/O TLB ops
Date: Wed,  9 Nov 2022 15:29:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109142903.4080275-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109142903.4080275-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>

Currently s390-iommu does an I/O TLB flush (RPCIT) for every update of
the I/O translation table explicitly. For one this is wasteful since
RPCIT can be skipped after a mapping operation if zdev->tlb_refresh is
unset. Moreover we can do a single RPCIT for a range of pages including
whne doing lazy unmapping.

Thankfully both of these optimizations can be achieved by implementing
the IOMMU operations common code provides for the different types of I/O
tlb flushes:

 * flush_iotlb_all: Flushes the I/O TLB for the entire IOVA space
 * iotlb_sync:  Flushes the I/O TLB for a range of pages that can be
   gathered up, for example to implement lazy unmapping.
 * iotlb_sync_map: Flushes the I/O TLB after a mapping operation

Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
v1->v2:
- Don't skip IOTLB flushes for other devices on IOTLB flush failure (Jason)

 drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
index e2c886bc4376..9771bce86e94 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
@@ -199,14 +199,63 @@ static void s390_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
 		__s390_iommu_detach_device(zdev);
 }
 
+static void s390_iommu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
+{
+	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
+	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+		zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32, zdev->start_dma,
+				   zdev->end_dma - zdev->start_dma + 1);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				  struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather)
+{
+	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
+	size_t size = gather->end - gather->start + 1;
+	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	/* If gather was never added to there is nothing to flush */
+	if (!gather->end)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+		zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32, gather->start,
+				   size);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				      unsigned long iova, size_t size)
+{
+	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
+	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
+		if (!zdev->tlb_refresh)
+			continue;
+		zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32,
+				   iova, size);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static int s390_iommu_update_trans(struct s390_domain *s390_domain,
 				   phys_addr_t pa, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
 				   unsigned long nr_pages, int flags)
 {
 	phys_addr_t page_addr = pa & PAGE_MASK;
-	dma_addr_t start_dma_addr = dma_addr;
 	unsigned long irq_flags, i;
-	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
 	unsigned long *entry;
 	int rc = 0;
 
@@ -225,15 +274,6 @@ static int s390_iommu_update_trans(struct s390_domain *s390_domain,
 		dma_addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&s390_domain->list_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(zdev, &s390_domain->devices, iommu_list) {
-		rc = zpci_refresh_trans((u64)zdev->fh << 32,
-					start_dma_addr, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
-		if (rc)
-			break;
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&s390_domain->list_lock);
-
 undo_cpu_trans:
 	if (rc && ((flags & ZPCI_PTE_VALID_MASK) == ZPCI_PTE_VALID)) {
 		flags = ZPCI_PTE_INVALID;
@@ -340,6 +380,8 @@ static size_t s390_iommu_unmap_pages(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	if (rc)
 		return 0;
 
+	iommu_iotlb_gather_add_range(gather, iova, size);
+
 	return size;
 }
 
@@ -384,6 +426,9 @@ static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops = {
 		.detach_dev	= s390_iommu_detach_device,
 		.map_pages	= s390_iommu_map_pages,
 		.unmap_pages	= s390_iommu_unmap_pages,
+		.flush_iotlb_all = s390_iommu_flush_iotlb_all,
+		.iotlb_sync      = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync,
+		.iotlb_sync_map  = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,
 		.iova_to_phys	= s390_iommu_iova_to_phys,
 		.free		= s390_domain_free,
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 14:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] iommu/s390: Further improvements Niklas Schnelle
2022-11-09 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/s390: Make attach succeed even if the device is in error state Niklas Schnelle
2022-11-14 15:05   ` Gerd Bayer
2022-11-14 15:30   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-11-09 14:29 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-11-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/s390: Use RCU to allow concurrent domain_list iteration Niklas Schnelle
2022-11-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/s390: Optimize IOMMU table walking Niklas Schnelle
2022-11-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] s390/pci: use lock-free I/O translation updates Niklas Schnelle
2022-11-19  9:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] iommu/s390: Further improvements Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221109142903.4080275-3-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox