From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 06/15] KVM: s390: VSIE: sort out virtual/physical address in pin_guest_page
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:39:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221125123947.31047-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125123947.31047-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
pin_guest_page() used page_to_virt() to calculate the hpa of the pinned
page. This currently works, because virtual and physical addresses are
the same. Use page_to_phys() instead to resolve the virtual-real address
confusion.
One caller of pin_guest_page() actually expected the hpa to be a hva, so
add the missing phys_to_virt() conversion here.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025082039.117372-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20221025082039.117372-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 94138f8f0c1c..0e9d020d7093 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int pin_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, hpa_t *hpa)
page = gfn_to_page(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
if (is_error_page(page))
return -EINVAL;
- *hpa = (hpa_t) page_to_virt(page) + (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK);
+ *hpa = (hpa_t)page_to_phys(page) + (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK);
return 0;
}
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static int pin_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page,
WARN_ON_ONCE(rc);
return 1;
}
- vsie_page->scb_o = (struct kvm_s390_sie_block *) hpa;
+ vsie_page->scb_o = phys_to_virt(hpa);
return 0;
}
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 12:39 [GIT PULL 00/15] KVM: s390: Updates for 6.2 Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 01/15] s390/mm: gmap: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 02/15] s390/entry: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage in sie64a Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 03/15] KVM: s390: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 04/15] KVM: s390: sida: " Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 05/15] KVM: s390: pv: " Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 07/15] s390/mm: fix virtual-physical address confusion for swiotlb Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 08/15] KVM: s390: pv: asynchronous destroy for reboot Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 09/15] KVM: s390: pv: api documentation for asynchronous destroy Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 10/15] KVM: s390: pv: add KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 11/15] KVM: s390: pv: avoid export before import if possible Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 12/15] KVM: s390: pv: support for Destroy fast UVC Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 13/15] KVM: s390: pv: module parameter to fence asynchronous destroy Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: GISA: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage Janosch Frank
2022-11-25 12:39 ` [GIT PULL 15/15] KVM: s390: remove unused gisa_clear_ipm_gisc() function Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221125123947.31047-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox