From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"farman@linux.ibm.com" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"pmorel@linux.ibm.com" <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@linux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"frankja@linux.ibm.com" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"imbrenda@linux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"akrowiak@linux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
"jjherne@linux.ibm.com" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"zhenyuw@linux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, "Christopherson, ,
Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:49:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230120084933.40f59c89.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6eff63d8-d825-aecd-12b5-e8dbf55f4372@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:45:40 -0500
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 1/20/23 10:08 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 11:05 PM
> >>
> >> Currently it is possible that the final put of a KVM reference comes from
> >> vfio during its device close operation. This occurs while the vfio group
> >> lock is held; however, if the vfio device is still in the kvm device list,
> >> then the following call chain could result in a deadlock:
> >>
> >> VFIO holds group->group_lock/group_rwsem
> >> -> kvm_put_kvm
> >> -> kvm_destroy_vm
> >> -> kvm_destroy_devices
> >> -> kvm_vfio_destroy
> >> -> kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm
> >> -> vfio_file_set_kvm
> >> -> try to hold group->group_lock/group_rwsem
> >>
> >> The key function is the kvm_destroy_devices() which triggers destroy cb
> >> of kvm_device_ops. It calls back to vfio and try to hold group_lock. So
> >> if this path doesn't call back to vfio, this dead lock would be fixed.
> >> Actually, there is a way for it. KVM provides another point to free the
> >> kvm-vfio device which is the point when the device file descriptor is
> >> closed. This can be achieved by providing the release cb instead of the
> >> destroy cb. Also rename kvm_vfio_destroy() to be kvm_vfio_release().
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Destroy is responsible for freeing dev.
> >> *
> >> * Destroy may be called before or after destructors are called
> >> * on emulated I/O regions, depending on whether a reference is
> >> * held by a vcpu or other kvm component that gets destroyed
> >> * after the emulated I/O.
> >> */
> >> void (*destroy)(struct kvm_device *dev);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Release is an alternative method to free the device. It is
> >> * called when the device file descriptor is closed. Once
> >> * release is called, the destroy method will not be called
> >> * anymore as the device is removed from the device list of
> >> * the VM. kvm->lock is held.
> >> */
> >> void (*release)(struct kvm_device *dev);
> >>
> >> Fixes: 421cfe6596f6 ("vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM")
> >> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > More background can be found in Mathew's work.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230114000351.115444-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com/T/#u
> >
>
> Thanks Yi.
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>
> One small nit: There is a comment at the very end of
> kvm_vfio_release on the kfree(dev) that still references .destroy,
> this should be updated to .release
I've fixed this locally, s/destroy/release/ in that comment. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 15:05 [PATCH] kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock Yi Liu
2023-01-20 15:08 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-01-20 15:45 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-20 15:49 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-01-20 17:58 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-31 14:27 ` Anthony Krowiak
2023-01-31 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:46 ` Anthony Krowiak
2023-01-31 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 15:00 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-31 15:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:35 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230120084933.40f59c89.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox