From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:44:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230228204403.460107-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Test the instruction address used by targets of an execute instruction.
When the target instruction calculates a relative address, the result is
relative to the target instruction, not the execute instruction.
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
* add some comments (thanks Janosch)
* add two new tests (drop Nico's R-b)
* push prefix
v1 -> v2:
* add test to unittests.cfg and .gitlab-ci.yml
* pick up R-b (thanks Nico)
TCG does the address calculation relative to the execute instruction.
Everything that has an operand that is relative to the instruction given by
the immediate in the instruction and goes through in2_ri2 in TCG has this
problem, because in2_ri2 does the calculation relative to pc_next which is the
address of the EX(RL).
That should make fixing it easier tho.
Range-diff against v2:
1: 08bae04a ! 1: 136eb2a2 s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
@@ Commit message
relative to the target instruction, not the execute instruction.
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
- Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
## s390x/Makefile ##
@@ s390x/Makefile: tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-extint.elf
@@ s390x/ex.c (new)
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
+ *
+ * Test EXECUTE (RELATIVE LONG).
++ * These instruction execute a target instruction. The target instruction is formed
++ * by reading an instruction from memory and optionally modifying some of its bits.
++ * The execution of the target instruction is the same as if it was executed
++ * normally as part of the instruction sequence, except for the instruction
++ * address and the instruction-length code.
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+
++/*
++ * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
++ * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
++ * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
++ * specified as target.
++ * BASR does *not* perform a relative address calculation with an intermediate.
++ */
+static void test_basr(void)
+{
+ uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
@@ s390x/ex.c (new)
+}
+
+/*
-+ * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address is relative to
-+ * BRAS when it is the target of an execute-type instruction.
++ * BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE.
++ * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address calculated relative
++ * to the instruction address is relative to BRAS when it is the target of an
++ * execute-type instruction, not relative to the execute-type instruction.
+ */
+static void test_bras(void)
+{
@@ s390x/ex.c (new)
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
++/*
++ * LOAD ADDRESS RELATIVE LONG.
++ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
++ * to the LARL.
++ */
+static void test_larl(void)
+{
+ uint64_t target, addr;
@@ s390x/ex.c (new)
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
++/* LOAD LOGICAL RELATIVE LONG.
++ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
++ * to the LLGFRL.
++ */
++static void test_llgfrl(void)
++{
++ uint64_t target, value;
++
++ report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
++ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
++ " .balign 4\n"
++ "0: llgfrl %[value],0\n"
++ " .popsection\n"
++
++ " llgfrl %[target],0b\n"
++ " exrl 0,0b\n"
++ : [target] "=d" (target),
++ [value] "=d" (value)
++ );
++
++ report(target == value, "loaded correct value");
++ report_prefix_pop();
++}
++
++/*
++ * COMPARE RELATIVE LONG
++ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
++ * to the CRL.
++ */
++static void test_crl(void)
++{
++ uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
++
++ report_prefix_push("CRL");
++ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
++ " .balign 4\n" //operand of crl must be word aligned
++ "0: crl %[crl_word],0\n"
++ " .popsection\n"
++
++ " lrl %[crl_word],0b\n"
++ //align (pad with nop), in case the wrong bad operand is used
++ " .balignw 4,0x0707\n"
++ " exrl 0,0b\n"
++ " ipm %[program_mask]\n"
++ : [program_mask] "=d" (program_mask),
++ [crl_word] "=d" (crl_word)
++ :: "cc"
++ );
++
++ cc = program_mask >> 28;
++ report(!cc, "operand compared to is relative to CRL");
++ report_prefix_pop();
++}
++
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
++ report_prefix_push("ex");
+ test_basr();
+ test_bras();
+ test_larl();
++ test_llgfrl();
++ test_crl();
++ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ return report_summary();
+}
s390x/Makefile | 1 +
s390x/ex.c | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 +
.gitlab-ci.yml | 1 +
4 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 s390x/ex.c
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 97a61611..6cf8018b 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-extint.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-pgm.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-sck.elf
tests += $(TEST_DIR)/exittime.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/ex.elf
pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
diff --git a/s390x/ex.c b/s390x/ex.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3a22e496
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/ex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
+ *
+ * Test EXECUTE (RELATIVE LONG).
+ * These instruction execute a target instruction. The target instruction is formed
+ * by reading an instruction from memory and optionally modifying some of its bits.
+ * The execution of the target instruction is the same as if it was executed
+ * normally as part of the instruction sequence, except for the instruction
+ * address and the instruction-length code.
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+
+/*
+ * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
+ * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
+ * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
+ * specified as target.
+ * BASR does *not* perform a relative address calculation with an intermediate.
+ */
+static void test_basr(void)
+{
+ uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
+
+ report_prefix_push("BASR");
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
+ "0: basr %[ret_addr],0\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " larl %[after_ex],1f\n"
+ " exrl 0,0b\n"
+ "1:\n"
+ : [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
+ [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex)
+ );
+
+ report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE.
+ * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address calculated relative
+ * to the instruction address is relative to BRAS when it is the target of an
+ * execute-type instruction, not relative to the execute-type instruction.
+ */
+static void test_bras(void)
+{
+ uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr;
+
+ report_prefix_push("BRAS");
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.ex_bras, \"x\"\n"
+ "0: bras %[ret_addr],1f\n"
+ " nopr %%r7\n"
+ "1: larl %[branch_addr],0\n"
+ " j 4f\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " larl %[after_target],1b\n"
+ " larl %[after_ex],3f\n"
+ "2: exrl 0,0b\n"
+ "3: larl %[branch_addr],0\n"
+ "4:\n"
+
+ " .if (1b - 0b) != (3b - 2b)\n"
+ " .error \"right and wrong target must have same offset\"\n"
+ " .endif\n"
+ : [after_target] "=d" (after_target),
+ [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
+ [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex),
+ [branch_addr] "=d" (branch_addr)
+ );
+
+ report(after_target == branch_addr, "address calculated relative to BRAS");
+ report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * LOAD ADDRESS RELATIVE LONG.
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the LARL.
+ */
+static void test_larl(void)
+{
+ uint64_t target, addr;
+
+ report_prefix_push("LARL");
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
+ "0: larl %[addr],0\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " larl %[target],0b\n"
+ " exrl 0,0b\n"
+ : [target] "=d" (target),
+ [addr] "=d" (addr)
+ );
+
+ report(target == addr, "address calculated relative to LARL");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/* LOAD LOGICAL RELATIVE LONG.
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the LLGFRL.
+ */
+static void test_llgfrl(void)
+{
+ uint64_t target, value;
+
+ report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
+ " .balign 4\n"
+ "0: llgfrl %[value],0\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " llgfrl %[target],0b\n"
+ " exrl 0,0b\n"
+ : [target] "=d" (target),
+ [value] "=d" (value)
+ );
+
+ report(target == value, "loaded correct value");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * COMPARE RELATIVE LONG
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the CRL.
+ */
+static void test_crl(void)
+{
+ uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
+
+ report_prefix_push("CRL");
+ asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
+ " .balign 4\n" //operand of crl must be word aligned
+ "0: crl %[crl_word],0\n"
+ " .popsection\n"
+
+ " lrl %[crl_word],0b\n"
+ //align (pad with nop), in case the wrong bad operand is used
+ " .balignw 4,0x0707\n"
+ " exrl 0,0b\n"
+ " ipm %[program_mask]\n"
+ : [program_mask] "=d" (program_mask),
+ [crl_word] "=d" (crl_word)
+ :: "cc"
+ );
+
+ cc = program_mask >> 28;
+ report(!cc, "operand compared to is relative to CRL");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("ex");
+ test_basr();
+ test_bras();
+ test_larl();
+ test_llgfrl();
+ test_crl();
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index d97eb5e9..b61faf07 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -215,3 +215,6 @@ file = migration-skey.elf
smp = 2
groups = migration
extra_params = -append '--parallel'
+
+[execute]
+file = ex.elf
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
index ad7949c9..a999f64a 100644
--- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ s390x-kvm:
- ACCEL=kvm ./run_tests.sh
selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi diag10 diag308 pfmf
cmm vector gs iep cpumodel diag288 stsi sclp-1g sclp-3g css skrf sie
+ execute
| tee results.txt
- grep -q PASS results.txt && ! grep -q FAIL results.txt
only:
base-commit: e3c5c3ef2524c58023073c0fadde2e8ae3c04ec6
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 20:44 Nina Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2023-03-03 10:11 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions Janosch Frank
2023-03-03 10:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230228204403.460107-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox