From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mhartmay@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: ipl: fix physical-virtual confusion for diag308
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:34:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310133411.139275-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310133411.139275-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Diag 308 subcodes expect a physical address as their parameter.
This currently is not a bug, but in the future physical and virtual
addresses might differ.
Fix the confusion by doing a virtual-to-physical conversion in the
exported diag308() and leave the assembly wrapper __diag308() alone.
Note that several callers pass NULL as addr, so check for the case when
NULL is passed and pass 0 to hardware since virt_to_phys(0) might be
nonzero.
Suggested-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
index 5f0f5c86963a..afac9970ce42 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
@@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ static bool reipl_fcp_clear;
static bool reipl_ccw_clear;
static bool reipl_eckd_clear;
-static inline int __diag308(unsigned long subcode, void *addr)
+static inline int __diag308(unsigned long subcode, unsigned long addr)
{
union register_pair r1;
- r1.even = (unsigned long) addr;
+ r1.even = addr;
r1.odd = 0;
asm volatile(
" diag %[r1],%[subcode],0x308\n"
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static inline int __diag308(unsigned long subcode, void *addr)
int diag308(unsigned long subcode, void *addr)
{
diag_stat_inc(DIAG_STAT_X308);
- return __diag308(subcode, addr);
+ return __diag308(subcode, addr ? virt_to_phys(addr) : 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(diag308);
--
2.39.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 13:34 [PATCH v3 0/1] s390: ipl: fix physical-virtual confusion for diag308 Nico Boehr
2023-03-10 13:34 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2023-03-10 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
2023-03-31 6:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2023-03-31 7:16 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-04 6:39 ` Alexander Gordeev
2023-04-04 7:06 ` Nico Boehr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230310133411.139275-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox