From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
xudong.hao@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
terrence.xu@intel.com, yanting.jiang@intel.com,
zhenzhong.duan@intel.com, clegoate@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:42:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522134219.4a462b09.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513132827.39066-4-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:07 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> This makes the vfio file kAPIs to accept vfio device files, also a
> preparation for vfio device cdev support.
>
> For the kvm set with vfio device file, kvm pointer is stored in struct
> vfio_device_file, and use kvm_ref_lock to protect kvm set and kvm
> pointer usage within VFIO. This kvm pointer will be set to vfio_device
> after device file is bound to iommufd in the cdev path.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 2 ++
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index b1e327a85a32..69e1a0692b06 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct vfio_container;
>
> struct vfio_device_file {
> struct vfio_device *device;
> + spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
> + struct kvm *kvm;
> };
>
> void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 4665791aa2eb..8ef9210ad2aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> df->device = device;
> + spin_lock_init(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
>
> return df;
> }
> @@ -1190,13 +1191,23 @@ const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
> .mmap = vfio_device_fops_mmap,
> };
>
> +static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_from_file(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
> +
> + if (file->f_op != &vfio_device_fops)
> + return NULL;
> + return df->device;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vfio_file_is_valid - True if the file is valid vfio file
> * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
> */
> bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file)
> {
> - return vfio_group_from_file(file);
> + return vfio_group_from_file(file) ||
> + vfio_device_from_file(file);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
>
> @@ -1211,16 +1222,36 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
> */
> bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
> {
> + struct vfio_device *device;
> struct vfio_group *group;
>
> group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
> if (group)
> return vfio_group_enforced_coherent(group);
>
> + device = vfio_device_from_file(file);
> + if (device)
> + return device_iommu_capable(device->dev,
> + IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY);
> +
> return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
>
> +static void vfio_device_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
A general nit, we've been trying to maintain function naming based on
the object it operates on in vfio, for example vfio_group_set_kvm()
clearly operates on the struct vfio_group object. Here we have
vfio_device_file_set_kvm(), which would suggest it works on a
struct vfio_device_file, but we're passing a struct file.
vfio_file_set_kvm() is already taken below, so should this be:
static void vfio_df_set_kvm(struct vfio_device_file *df,
struct kvm *kvm)
After this series We end up with a number of functions where the object
doesn't really match, ex:
vfio_device_open -> vfio_df_open
vfio_device_close -> vfio_df_close
vfio_device_group_close -> vfio_df_group_close
vfio_iommufd_bind -> vfio_df_iommufd_bind
vfio_iommufd_unbind -> vfio_df_iommufd_unbind
vfio_device_cdev_close -> vfio_df_cdev_close
vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd -> vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd
vfio_ioctl_device_attach -> vfio_df_ioctl_attach_pt
vfio_ioctl_device_detach -> vfio_df_ioctl_detach_pt
"df" is just a suggestion, maybe someone has a better one. Thanks,
Alex
> +{
> + struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The kvm is first recorded in the vfio_device_file, and will
> + * be propagated to vfio_device::kvm when the file is bound to
> + * iommufd successfully in the vfio device cdev path.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> + df->kvm = kvm;
> + spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
> * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
> @@ -1236,6 +1267,9 @@ void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
> group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
> if (group)
> vfio_group_set_kvm(group, kvm);
> +
> + if (vfio_device_from_file(file))
> + vfio_device_file_set_kvm(file, kvm);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
2023-05-22 19:42 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
2023-05-22 20:24 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 0:45 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-05-22 20:46 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-22 20:59 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 1:34 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
2023-05-22 22:01 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 1:41 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-23 15:51 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-24 2:20 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24 2:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-24 2:40 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24 8:31 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
2023-05-22 22:15 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 1:20 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-23 15:50 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-24 2:12 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24 15:31 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-25 3:03 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-25 15:59 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-26 8:38 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-06 14:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-06 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
2023-05-22 23:04 ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23 2:13 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24 8:14 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
2023-05-18 5:39 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Xu, Terrence
2023-05-23 7:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230522134219.4a462b09.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=clegoate@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=terrence.xu@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yanting.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox