From: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] s390/dasd: Use correct lock while counting channel queue length
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:37:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230609153750.1258763-2-sth@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230609153750.1258763-1-sth@linux.ibm.com>
From: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
The lock around counting the channel queue length in the BIODASDINFO
ioctl was incorrectly changed to the dasd_block->queue_lock with commit
583d6535cb9d ("dasd: remove dead code"). This can lead to endless list
iterations and a subsequent crash.
The queue_lock is supposed to be used only for queue lists belonging to
dasd_block. For dasd_device related queue lists the ccwdev lock must be
used.
Fix the mentioned issues by correctly using the ccwdev lock instead of
the queue lock.
Fixes: 583d6535cb9d ("dasd: remove dead code")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.0+
Signed-off-by: Jan Höppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
index 9327dcdd6e5e..8fca725b3dae 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c
@@ -552,10 +552,10 @@ static int __dasd_ioctl_information(struct dasd_block *block,
memcpy(dasd_info->type, base->discipline->name, 4);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&block->queue_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(get_ccwdev_lock(base->cdev), flags);
list_for_each(l, &base->ccw_queue)
dasd_info->chanq_len++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&block->queue_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(get_ccwdev_lock(base->cdev), flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-09 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 15:37 [PATCH 0/1] s390/dasd: fix locking error Stefan Haberland
2023-06-09 15:37 ` Stefan Haberland [this message]
2023-06-09 17:36 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230609153750.1258763-2-sth@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox