public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Don't WARN on PV validities
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:03:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710160304.729a8c51@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230706145335.136910-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu,  6 Jul 2023 14:53:35 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Validities usually indicate KVM errors and as such we want to print a
> message with a high priority to alert users that a validity
> occurred. With the introduction of Protected VMs it's become very easy
> to trigger validities via IOCTLs if the VM is in PV mode.
> 
> An optimal solution would be to return EINVALs to all IOCTLs that
> could result in such a situation. Unfortunately there are quite a lot
> of ways to trigger PV validities since the number of allowed SCB data
> combinations are very limited by FW in order to provide the guest's
> security.
> 
> Let's only log those validities to the KVM sysfs log and skip the
> WARN_ONCE(). This way we get a longish lasting log entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
> 
> int -> ext:
>  * Fixed range
>  * Extended commit message 
> 
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> index 954d39adf85c..f3c1220fd1e2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> @@ -97,9 +97,15 @@ static int handle_validity(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	KVM_EVENT(3, "validity intercept 0x%x for pid %u (kvm 0x%pK)", viwhy,
>  		  current->pid, vcpu->kvm);
>  
> -	/* do not warn on invalid runtime instrumentation mode */
> -	WARN_ONCE(viwhy != 0x44, "kvm: unhandled validity intercept 0x%x\n",
> -		  viwhy);
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not warn on:
> +	 *  - invalid runtime instrumentation mode
> +	 *  - PV related validities since they can be triggered by userspace
> +	 *    PV validities are in the 0x2XXX range
> +	 */
> +	WARN_ONCE(viwhy != 0x44 &&
> +		  ((viwhy < 0x2000) || (viwhy >= 0x3000)),
> +		  "kvm: unhandled validity intercept 0x%x\n", viwhy);
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-10 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 14:53 [PATCH] KVM: s390: Don't WARN on PV validities Janosch Frank
2023-07-07  8:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-07-10 14:03 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230710160304.729a8c51@p-imbrenda \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox