public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] s390/preempt: mark all functions __always_inline
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:47:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240320230007.4782-3-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240320230007.4782-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

preempt_count-related functions are quite ubiquitous and may be called
by noinstr ones, introducing unwanted instrumentation. Here is one
example call chain:

  irqentry_nmi_enter()  # noinstr
    lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()
      this_cpu_read()
        __pcpu_size_call_return()
          this_cpu_read_*()
            this_cpu_generic_read()
              __this_cpu_generic_read_nopreempt()
                preempt_disable_notrace()
                  __preempt_count_inc()
                    __preempt_count_add()

They are very small, so there are no significant downsides to
force-inlining them.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
index bf15da0fedbc..0e3da500e98c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@
 #define PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED	0x80000000
 #define PREEMPT_ENABLED	(0 + PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED)
 
-static inline int preempt_count(void)
+static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
 {
 	return READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
 }
 
-static inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
+static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 {
 	int old, new;
 
@@ -29,22 +29,22 @@ static inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 				  old, new) != old);
 }
 
-static inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 	__atomic_and(~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
 }
 
-static inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 	__atomic_or(PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
 }
 
-static inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 	return !(READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) & PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
 }
 
-static inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
+static __always_inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
 {
 	/*
 	 * With some obscure config options and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
@@ -59,17 +59,17 @@ static inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
 	__atomic_add(val, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
 }
 
-static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
+static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 {
 	__preempt_count_add(-val);
 }
 
-static inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
+static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 {
 	return __atomic_add(-1, &S390_lowcore.preempt_count) == 1;
 }
 
-static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
 	return unlikely(READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) ==
 			preempt_offset);
@@ -79,45 +79,45 @@ static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 
 #define PREEMPT_ENABLED	(0)
 
-static inline int preempt_count(void)
+static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
 {
 	return READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count);
 }
 
-static inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
+static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
 {
 	S390_lowcore.preempt_count = pc;
 }
 
-static inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 }
 
-static inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
 {
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
+static __always_inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
 {
 	S390_lowcore.preempt_count += val;
 }
 
-static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
+static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 {
 	S390_lowcore.preempt_count -= val;
 }
 
-static inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
+static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 {
 	return !--S390_lowcore.preempt_count && tif_need_resched();
 }
 
-static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
+static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 {
 	return unlikely(preempt_count() == preempt_offset &&
 			tif_need_resched());
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-20 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-20 22:47 [PATCH 0/2] s390/preempt: mark all functions __always_inline Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-03-20 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] s390/atomic: " Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-03-20 22:47 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2024-03-21  6:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] s390/preempt: " Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240320230007.4782-3-iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox