[GIT PULL 11/14] KVM: s390: add concurrent-function facility to cpu model

[Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>]

From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>

Adding support for concurrent-functions facility which provides
additional subfunctions.

Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107152319.77816-2-brueckner@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20241107152319.77816-2-brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  3 ++-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c |  1 +
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 05eaf6db3ad4..60345dd2cba2 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc {
 	__u8 kdsa[16];		/* with MSA9 */
 	__u8 sortl[32];		/* with STFLE.150 */
 	__u8 dfltcc[32];	/* with STFLE.151 */
-	__u8 reserved[1728];
+	__u8 pfcr[16];		/* with STFLE.201 */
+	__u8 reserved[1712];
 };
 
 #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST	6
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index bb7134faaebf..74f385b5efbd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -348,6 +348,16 @@ static inline int plo_test_bit(unsigned char nr)
 	return cc == 0;
 }
 
+static __always_inline void pfcr_query(u8 (*query)[16])
+{
+	asm volatile(
+		"	lghi	0,0\n"
+		"	.insn   rsy,0xeb0000000016,0,0,%[query]\n"
+		: [query] "=QS" (*query)
+		:
+		: "cc", "0");
+}
+
 static __always_inline void __sortl_query(u8 (*query)[32])
 {
 	asm volatile(
@@ -429,6 +439,9 @@ static void __init kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
 	if (test_facility(151)) /* DFLTCC */
 		__dfltcc_query(&kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc);
 
+	if (test_facility(201))	/* PFCR */
+		pfcr_query(&kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr);
+
 	if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP)
 		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP);
 	/*
@@ -1543,6 +1556,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm,
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[1],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[2],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[3]);
+	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest PFCR   subfunc 0x%16.16lx.%16.16lx",
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[0],
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[1]);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1757,6 +1773,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm,
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[1],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[2],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm->arch.model.subfuncs.dfltcc)[3]);
+	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest PFCR   subfunc 0x%16.16lx.%16.16lx",
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[0],
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[1]);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1825,6 +1844,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm,
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc)[1],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc)[2],
 		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc)[3]);
+	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: host  PFCR   subfunc 0x%16.16lx.%16.16lx",
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[0],
+		 ((unsigned long *) &kvm_s390_available_subfunc.pfcr)[1]);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
index 68580cbea4e6..1d0efd3c3e7c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
+++ b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static struct facility_def facility_defs[] = {
 			194, /* rdp enhancement facility */
 			196, /* processor activity instrumentation facility */
 			197, /* processor activity instrumentation extension 1 */
+			201, /* concurrent-functions facility */
 			-1  /* END */
 		}
 	},
-- 
2.47.0