From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
farman@linux.ibm.com, clegoate@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iommu/s390: implement iommu passthrough via identity domain
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 13:30:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250128173002.GE1524382@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250124201717.348736-4-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:17:17PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Enabled via the kernel command-line 'iommu.passthrough=1' option.
>
> Introduce the concept of identity domains to s390-iommu, which relies on
> the bus_dma_region to offset identity mappings to the start of the DMA
> aperture advertized by CLP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 6 ++-
> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Seems Ok
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> -static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops = {
> - .blocked_domain = &blocking_domain,
> - .release_domain = &blocking_domain,
> - .capable = s390_iommu_capable,
> - .domain_alloc_paging = s390_domain_alloc_paging,
> - .probe_device = s390_iommu_probe_device,
> - .device_group = generic_device_group,
> - .pgsize_bitmap = SZ_4K,
> - .get_resv_regions = s390_iommu_get_resv_regions,
> - .default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
> - .attach_dev = s390_iommu_attach_device,
> - .map_pages = s390_iommu_map_pages,
> - .unmap_pages = s390_iommu_unmap_pages,
> - .flush_iotlb_all = s390_iommu_flush_iotlb_all,
> - .iotlb_sync = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync,
> - .iotlb_sync_map = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,
> - .iova_to_phys = s390_iommu_iova_to_phys,
> - .free = s390_domain_free,
> +#define S390_IOMMU_COMMON_OPS() \
> + .blocked_domain = &blocking_domain, \
> + .release_domain = &blocking_domain, \
> + .capable = s390_iommu_capable, \
> + .domain_alloc_paging = s390_domain_alloc_paging, \
> + .probe_device = s390_iommu_probe_device, \
> + .device_group = generic_device_group, \
> + .pgsize_bitmap = SZ_4K, \
> + .get_resv_regions = s390_iommu_get_resv_regions, \
> + .default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) { \
> + .attach_dev = s390_iommu_attach_device, \
> + .map_pages = s390_iommu_map_pages, \
> + .unmap_pages = s390_iommu_unmap_pages, \
> + .flush_iotlb_all = s390_iommu_flush_iotlb_all, \
> + .iotlb_sync = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync, \
> + .iotlb_sync_map = s390_iommu_iotlb_sync_map, \
> + .iova_to_phys = s390_iommu_iova_to_phys, \
> + .free = s390_domain_free, \
> }
> +
> +static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_ops = {
> + S390_IOMMU_COMMON_OPS()
> +};
> +
> +static const struct iommu_ops s390_iommu_rtr_ops = {
> + .identity_domain = &s390_identity_domain,
> + S390_IOMMU_COMMON_OPS()
> };
Though it is a pattern in iommu drivers to use a non-cost ops and
mutate them during probe. For instance you could NULL
s390_iommu_rtr_ops->identity_domain if the platform does not support
it.
On the other hand your version with a const ops is security nicer.
Alternatively, I have a patch series that adds a
domain_alloc_identity() function to get virtio-iommu moved to the new
APIs, that could work well here too and keep the const ops.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 20:17 [PATCH v3 0/3] iommu/s390: add support for IOMMU passthrough Matthew Rosato
2025-01-24 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] s390/pci: check for relaxed translation capability Matthew Rosato
2025-01-29 10:07 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-01-24 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma_region Matthew Rosato
2025-01-29 10:20 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-01-24 20:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] iommu/s390: implement iommu passthrough via identity domain Matthew Rosato
2025-01-28 17:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-01-29 10:29 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-01-30 7:43 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-02-05 19:55 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250128173002.GE1524382@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clegoate@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox