From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: [GIT PULL v2 07/20] KVM: s390: fake memslot for ucontrol VMs
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250131112510.48531-8-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250131112510.48531-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Create a fake memslot for ucontrol VMs. The fake memslot identity-maps
userspace.
Now memslots will always be present, and ucontrol is not a special case
anymore.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250123144627.312456-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20250123144627.312456-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 0d1c3a820ce6..2b52eb77e29c 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ fetch) is injected in the guest.
S390:
^^^^^
-Returns -EINVAL if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
+Returns -EINVAL or -EEXIST if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
Returns -EINVAL if called on a protected VM.
4.36 KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4581388411b7..9a367866cab0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#define KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS 248
#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 255
+#define KVM_INTERNAL_MEM_SLOTS 1
+
/*
* These seem to be used for allocating ->chip in the routing table, which we
* don't use. 1 is as small as we can get to reduce the needed memory. If we
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index ecbdd7d41230..fc44002a7b04 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3428,8 +3428,20 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "vm created with type %lu", type);
if (type & KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL) {
+ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 fake_memslot = {
+ .slot = KVM_S390_UCONTROL_MEMSLOT,
+ .guest_phys_addr = 0,
+ .userspace_addr = 0,
+ .memory_size = ALIGN_DOWN(TASK_SIZE, _SEGMENT_SIZE),
+ .flags = 0,
+ };
+
kvm->arch.gmap = NULL;
kvm->arch.mem_limit = KVM_S390_NO_MEM_LIMIT;
+ /* one flat fake memslot covering the whole address-space */
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_set_internal_memslot(kvm, &fake_memslot), kvm);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
} else {
if (sclp.hamax == U64_MAX)
kvm->arch.mem_limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
@@ -5854,7 +5866,7 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
{
gpa_t size;
- if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
+ if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm) && new->id < KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
return -EINVAL;
/* When we are protected, we should not change the memory slots */
@@ -5906,6 +5918,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
{
int rc = 0;
+ if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
+ return;
+
switch (change) {
case KVM_MR_DELETE:
rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 597d7a71deeb..30736ac16f84 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/sclp.h>
+#define KVM_S390_UCONTROL_MEMSLOT (KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS + 0)
+
static inline void kvm_s390_fpu_store(struct kvm_run *run)
{
fpu_stfpc(&run->s.regs.fpc);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 11:24 [GIT PULL v2 00/20] KVM: s390: some non-trivial fixes and cleanups for 6.14 Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 01/20] KVM: s390: vsie: fix some corner-cases when grabbing vsie pages Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 02/20] KVM: s390: vsie: stop using page->index Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 03/20] KVM: s390: vsie: stop messing with page refcount Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 04/20] KVM: s390: vsie: stop using "struct page" for vsie page Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 05/20] KVM: Do not restrict the size of KVM-internal memory regions Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 06/20] KVM: s390: wrapper for KVM_BUG Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 08/20] KVM: s390: selftests: fix ucontrol memory region test Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:24 ` [GIT PULL v2 09/20] KVM: s390: move pv gmap functions into kvm Claudio Imbrenda
2025-02-12 16:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-12 17:45 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-02-12 18:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-13 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 10/20] KVM: s390: use __kvm_faultin_pfn() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 11/20] KVM: s390: get rid of gmap_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 12/20] KVM: s390: get rid of gmap_translate() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 13/20] KVM: s390: move some gmap shadowing functions away from mm/gmap.c Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 14/20] KVM: s390: stop using page->index for non-shadow gmaps Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 15/20] KVM: s390: stop using lists to keep track of used dat tables Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 16/20] KVM: s390: move gmap_shadow_pgt_lookup() into kvm Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 17/20] KVM: s390: remove useless page->index usage Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 18/20] KVM: s390: move PGSTE softbits Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 19/20] KVM: s390: remove the last user of page->index Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-31 11:25 ` [GIT PULL v2 20/20] KVM: s390: selftests: Streamline uc_skey test to issue iske after sske Claudio Imbrenda
2025-02-06 9:39 ` [GIT PULL v2 00/20] KVM: s390: some non-trivial fixes and cleanups for 6.14 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250131112510.48531-8-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox