public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	seiden@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, schlameuss@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: s390: refactor and split some gmap helpers
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 15:21:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250526152157.23743974@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e058fd1-ccee-43c3-92eb-ad72d2dbc1f3@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 26 May 2025 13:17:35 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 5/20/25 8:26 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Refactor some gmap functions; move the implementation into a separate
> > file with only helper functions. The new helper functions work on vm
> > addresses, leaving all gmap logic in the gmap functions, which mostly
> > become just wrappers.
> > 
> > The whole gmap handling is going to be moved inside KVM soon, but the
> > helper functions need to touch core mm functions, and thus need to
> > stay in the core of kernel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >   MAINTAINERS                          |   2 +
> >   arch/s390/include/asm/gmap_helpers.h |  18 ++
> >   arch/s390/kvm/diag.c                 |  11 +-
> >   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c             |   5 +-
> >   arch/s390/mm/Makefile                |   2 +
> >   arch/s390/mm/gmap.c                  |  46 ++---
> >   arch/s390/mm/gmap_helpers.c          | 259 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   7 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/gmap_helpers.h
> >   create mode 100644 arch/s390/mm/gmap_helpers.c  
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/Makefile b/arch/s390/mm/Makefile
> > index 9726b91fe7e4..bd0401cc7ca5 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/mm/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/Makefile
> > @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP)		+= dump_pagetables.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_PGSTE)		+= gmap.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_PFAULT)		+= pfault.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_KVM))	+= gmap_helpers.o  
> 
> So gmap.o depends on PGSTE but gmap_helpers.o depends on KVM.
> Yes, PGSTE is Y if KVM is set, but this looks really strange.

yes, CONFIG_PGSTE will go away in the final series

No point in using CONFIG_PGSTE here knowing it will go away soon anyway

> 
> 
> @Heiko:
> Can we move away from CONFIG_PGSTE and start using CONFIG_KVM instead?
> Well, maybe this goes away with Claudio's rework anyway.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-26 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20 18:26 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: s390: some cleanup and small fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-20 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] s390: remove unneeded includes Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-20 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: s390: remove unneeded srcu lock Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-22 13:07   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-20 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: s390: refactor some functions in priv.c Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-21 15:52   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-05-27  7:18   ` Nico Boehr
2025-05-27  9:14     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-20 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: s390: refactor and split some gmap helpers Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-21 16:26   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-05-26 11:17   ` Janosch Frank
2025-05-26 11:59     ` Heiko Carstens
2025-05-26 13:21     ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2025-05-20 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: s390: simplify and move pv code Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250526152157.23743974@p-imbrenda \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox