From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
dengler@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, gmazyland@gmail.com,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] dm-integrity: use internal variable for digestsize
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:16:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908131735.767017373@debian4.vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250908131642.385445532@debian4.vm
Instead of calling digestsize() each time the digestsize for
the internal hash is needed, store the digestsize in a new
field internal_hash_digestsize within struct dm_integrity_c
once and use this value when needed.
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c 2025-08-15 17:31:52.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c 2025-08-15 17:33:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ struct dm_integrity_c {
int failed;
struct crypto_shash *internal_hash;
+ unsigned int internal_hash_digestsize;
struct dm_target *ti;
@@ -1676,7 +1677,7 @@ static void integrity_sector_checksum(st
goto failed;
}
- digest_size = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
+ digest_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
if (unlikely(digest_size < ic->tag_size))
memset(result + digest_size, 0, ic->tag_size - digest_size);
@@ -1776,7 +1777,7 @@ static void integrity_metadata(struct wo
if (ic->internal_hash) {
struct bvec_iter iter;
struct bio_vec bv;
- unsigned int digest_size = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
+ unsigned int digest_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
struct bio *bio = dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(dio, sizeof(struct dm_integrity_io));
char *checksums;
unsigned int extra_space = unlikely(digest_size > ic->tag_size) ? digest_size - ic->tag_size : 0;
@@ -2124,7 +2125,7 @@ retry_kmap:
} while (++s < ic->sectors_per_block);
if (ic->internal_hash) {
- unsigned int digest_size = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
+ unsigned int digest_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
if (unlikely(digest_size > ic->tag_size)) {
char checksums_onstack[HASH_MAX_DIGESTSIZE];
@@ -2428,7 +2429,7 @@ retry:
if (!dio->integrity_payload) {
unsigned digest_size, extra_size;
dio->payload_len = ic->tuple_size * (bio_sectors(bio) >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block);
- digest_size = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
+ digest_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
extra_size = unlikely(digest_size > ic->tag_size) ? digest_size - ic->tag_size : 0;
dio->payload_len += extra_size;
dio->integrity_payload = kmalloc(dio->payload_len, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -2589,7 +2590,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_inline_recheck(
bio_put(outgoing_bio);
integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, outgoing_data, digest);
- if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(digest, dio->integrity_payload, min(crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash), ic->tag_size)))) {
+ if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(digest, dio->integrity_payload, min(ic->internal_hash_digestsize, ic->tag_size)))) {
DMERR_LIMIT("%pg: Checksum failed at sector 0x%llx",
ic->dev->bdev, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector);
atomic64_inc(&ic->number_of_mismatches);
@@ -2629,7 +2630,7 @@ static int dm_integrity_end_io(struct dm
//memset(mem, 0xff, ic->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
integrity_sector_checksum(ic, dio->bio_details.bi_iter.bi_sector, mem, digest);
if (unlikely(crypto_memneq(digest, dio->integrity_payload + pos,
- min(crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash), ic->tag_size)))) {
+ min(ic->internal_hash_digestsize, ic->tag_size)))) {
kunmap_local(mem);
dm_integrity_free_payload(dio);
INIT_WORK(&dio->work, dm_integrity_inline_recheck);
@@ -3011,8 +3012,8 @@ oom:
goto free_ret;
}
recalc_tags_size = (recalc_sectors >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tag_size;
- if (crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) > ic->tag_size)
- recalc_tags_size += crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) - ic->tag_size;
+ if (ic->internal_hash_digestsize > ic->tag_size)
+ recalc_tags_size += ic->internal_hash_digestsize - ic->tag_size;
recalc_tags = kvmalloc(recalc_tags_size, GFP_NOIO);
if (!recalc_tags) {
vfree(recalc_buffer);
@@ -3171,8 +3172,8 @@ oom:
}
recalc_tags_size = (recalc_sectors >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tuple_size;
- if (crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) > ic->tuple_size)
- recalc_tags_size += crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) - ic->tuple_size;
+ if (ic->internal_hash_digestsize > ic->tuple_size)
+ recalc_tags_size += ic->internal_hash_digestsize - ic->tuple_size;
recalc_tags = kmalloc(recalc_tags_size, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!recalc_tags) {
kfree(recalc_buffer);
@@ -4694,6 +4695,8 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_ta
"Invalid internal hash", "Error setting internal hash key");
if (r)
goto bad;
+ if (ic->internal_hash)
+ ic->internal_hash_digestsize = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
r = get_mac(&ic->journal_mac, &ic->journal_mac_alg, &ti->error,
"Invalid journal mac", "Error setting journal mac key");
@@ -4706,7 +4709,7 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_ta
r = -EINVAL;
goto bad;
}
- ic->tag_size = crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash);
+ ic->tag_size = ic->internal_hash_digestsize;
}
if (ic->tag_size > MAX_TAG_SIZE) {
ti->error = "Too big tag size";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 13:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] dm-integrity: replace bvec_kmap_local with kmap_local_page Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] dm-integrity: introduce integrity_kmap and integrity_kunmap Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] dm-integrity: allocate the recalculate buffer with kmalloc Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] dm-integrity: add the "offset" argument Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] dm-integrity: rename internal_hash Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-08 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] dm-integrity: enable asynchronous hash interface Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-09 9:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 9:42 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-09 11:18 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 11:47 ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 11:50 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 12:15 ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 12:23 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-09 12:40 ` Milan Broz
2025-09-09 13:51 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-09 14:12 ` Milan Broz
2025-09-11 13:43 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-11 15:58 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-12 8:08 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-15 9:26 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-18 15:00 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-09-19 6:53 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-09-22 19:08 ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 3:47 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-23 11:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 14:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-09-23 15:17 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 10:20 ` [PATCH] crypto: authenc - Correctly pass EINPROGRESS back up to the caller Herbert Xu
2025-09-24 13:17 ` Ingo Franzki
2025-11-25 14:02 ` [PATCH] crypto/authenc: don't return -EBUSY when enqueuing the hash request Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-26 5:16 ` Herbert Xu
2025-09-09 13:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] dm-integrity: asynchronous hash support Harald Freudenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908131735.767017373@debian4.vm \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox