Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 18:04:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251001160415.GC408411@p1gen4-pw042f0m> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d049d60868c0f61e53e70a73881f8674368537a.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 12:54:07PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-09-24 at 10:16 -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> > +void pcibios_resource_to_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_bus_region *region,
> > +			     struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > +	struct zpci_bus *zbus = bus->sysdata;
> > +	struct zpci_bar_struct *zbar;
> > +	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
> > +
> > +	region->start = res->start;
> > +	region->end = res->end;
> 
> When we don't find a BAR matching the resource this would become the
> region used. I'm not sure what a better value would be if we don't find
> a match though and that should hopefully not happen in sensible uses.
> Also this would keep the existing behavior so seems fine.

I was wondering the same things, but I guess it matches what happens elsewhere
as well, if no match is found

	void __weak pcibios_resource_to_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_bus_region *region,
				     struct resource *res)
	{
		...
		resource_size_t offset = 0;

		resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &bridge->windows) {
			if (resource_contains(window->res, res)) {
				offset = window->offset;
				break;
			}
		}

		region->start = res->start - offset;
		region->end = res->end - offset;
	}

So I guess that is fine.

The thing I'm also unclear on is whether it is OK to "throw out" this whole
logic about `resource_contains(window->res, res)` here and
`region_contains(&bus_region, region)` in the other original function?
I mean, the original function don't search for perfect matches, but also
matches where are contained in a given resource/region, which is different
from what we do here. Are we OK with not doing that at all?

> > +
> > +	for (int i = 0; i < ZPCI_FUNCTIONS_PER_BUS; i++) {
> > +		int j = 0;
> > +
> > +		zbar = NULL;
> > +		zdev = zbus->function[i];
> > +		if (!zdev)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		for (j = 0; j < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; j++) {
> > +			if (zdev->bars[j].res->start == res->start &&
> > +			    zdev->bars[j].res->end == res->end &&
> > +			    res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> > +				zbar = &zdev->bars[j];
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (zbar) {
> > +			/* only MMIO is supported */
> > +			region->start = zbar->val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> > +			if (zbar->val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> > +				region->start |= (u64)zdev->bars[j + 1].val << 32;
> > +
> > +			region->end = region->start + (1UL << zbar->size) - 1;
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +}

-- 
Best Regards, Benjamin Block        /        Linux on IBM Z Kernel Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH    /   https://www.ibm.com/privacy
Vors. Aufs.-R.: Wolfgang Wendt         /        Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Ges.: Böblingen     /    Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-01 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 15:15   ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 17:12     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02  9:16       ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-04 14:54       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 17:54         ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-06 19:26           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 21:35             ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 13:34               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 17:56                 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 18:14                   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 21:55                     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-09  4:52                       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 17:02                         ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-12  6:43                           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09  9:12                     ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-12  6:34                       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-14 12:07                         ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-16 21:00                           ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-19 14:34                           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20  8:59                             ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-11-22 10:58                               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-30 10:03   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-30 17:04     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-01  8:33       ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 14:37   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 14:34   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 10:54   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-01 16:04     ` Benjamin Block [this message]
2025-10-01 18:01       ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 12:58   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-02 17:00     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-02 17:16       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-02 18:14       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 14:28   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-25 16:29     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-25  8:04   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251001160415.GC408411@p1gen4-pw042f0m \
    --to=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox