public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cmm: Account for NUL when calculating 'len' in cmm_timeout_handler
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:59:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251222105955.16440B52-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b00c8c6-e50b-454d-985d-0a5e2c3d77e9-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 08:57:24AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 01:22:14PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > When the input length 'lenp' equals sizeof(buf), the current code copies
> > all 64 bytes, but then immediately overwrites the last byte with a NUL
> > terminator. Limit the number of bytes to copy to 'sizeof(buf) - 1' to
> > reserve space for the NUL terminator.
> 
> I see you point, but can not see much of the benefit. Besides,
> to me buf[len] = '\0' rings like a past-end-of-the-buffer access
> (although it is not, it feels like that on a cursory look).
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/mm/cmm.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c b/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> > index eb7ef63fab1e..06512bc178a5 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> > @@ -311,9 +311,9 @@ static int cmm_timeout_handler(const struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (write) {
> > -		len = min(*lenp, sizeof(buf));
> > +		len = min(*lenp, sizeof(buf) - 1);
> >  		memcpy(buf, buffer, len);
> > -		buf[len - 1] = '\0';
> > +		buf[len] = '\0';

Well, I don't see any point at all: the compiler is able to tell the
same and may or may not generate code accordingly to what this patch
tries to improve. This patch is pointless.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15 12:22 [PATCH] s390/cmm: Account for NUL when calculating 'len' in cmm_timeout_handler Thorsten Blum
2025-12-18  7:57 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-12-22 10:59   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251222105955.16440B52-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox