From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: cap allocation order for SMC-R physically contiguous buffers
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:16:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414171655.GB772670@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414021054.GA111420@j66a10360.sqa.eu95>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 10:10:54AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 04:16:31PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 08:43:37PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> > > The alloc_pages() cannot satisfy requests exceeding MAX_PAGE_ORDER,
> > > and attempting such allocations will lead to guaranteed failures
> > > and potential kernel warnings.
> > >
> > > For SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS, cap the allocation order to MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
> > > This ensures the attempts to allocate the largest possible physically
> > > contiguous chunk succeed, instead of failing with an invalid order.
> > > This also avoids redundant "try-fail-degrade" cycles in
> > > __smc_buf_create().
> > >
> > > For SMCR_MIXED_BUFS, no cap is needed: if the order exceeds
> > > MAX_PAGE_ORDER, alloc_pages() will silently fail (__GFP_NOWARN)
> > > and automatically fall back to virtual memory.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes v1 -> v2:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260312082154.36971-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com/
> > >
> > > - Move the bufsize cap from smcr_new_buf_create() up to
> > > __smc_buf_create(), which is simpler and avoids touching
> > > the allocation logic itself.
> >
> > The nit below notwithstanding, this looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> >
> > > ---
> > > net/smc/smc_core.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > > index e2d083daeb7e..cdd881746e21 100644
> > > --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > > +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> > > @@ -2440,6 +2440,10 @@ static int __smc_buf_create(struct smc_sock *smc, bool is_smcd, bool is_rmb)
> > > /* use socket send buffer size (w/o overhead) as start value */
> > > bufsize = smc->sk.sk_sndbuf / 2;
> > >
> > > + /* limit bufsize for physically contiguous buffers */
> > > + if (!is_smcd && lgr->buf_type == SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS)
> > > + bufsize = min_t(int, bufsize, (PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER));
> >
> > nit: I think min() is sufficient here, and the inner parentheses are
> > unnecessary
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I think min_t is required here because min() triggers a signedness
> error:
>
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:706:38: error: call to
> ‘__compiletime_assert_950’ declared with attribute error: min(bufsize,
> ((1UL) << 12) << 10) signedness error
>
> The inner parentheses can be removed, though.
Ack, thanks for checking.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 12:43 [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: cap allocation order for SMC-R physically contiguous buffers D. Wythe
2026-04-10 15:16 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-14 2:10 ` D. Wythe
2026-04-14 17:16 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414171655.GB772670@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox