From: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: sclp: Rework sclp_facilities_setup() for simpler control flow
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260421-vsie-stfle-fac-v3-3-3cee84efefa3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-vsie-stfle-fac-v3-0-3cee84efefa3@linux.ibm.com>
Reverse the order of operations to allow for early exits with increasing
cpu offsets when reading facility bits in the extended range.
This is done to ease future additions like the one in the next patch in
this series.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/sclp.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index 2f902e39e785..d624872cba60 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -154,17 +154,6 @@ void sclp_facilities_setup(void)
assert(read_info);
cpu = sclp_get_cpu_entries();
- if (read_info->offset_cpu > 134)
- sclp_facilities.has_diag318 = read_info->byte_134_diag318;
- sclp_facilities.has_sop = sclp_feat_check(80, SCLP_FEAT_80_BIT_SOP);
- sclp_facilities.has_gsls = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_GSLS);
- sclp_facilities.has_esop = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_ESOP);
- sclp_facilities.has_kss = sclp_feat_check(98, SCLP_FEAT_98_BIT_KSS);
- sclp_facilities.has_cmma = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_CMMA);
- sclp_facilities.has_64bscao = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_64BSCAO);
- sclp_facilities.has_esca = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA);
- sclp_facilities.has_ibs = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS);
- sclp_facilities.has_pfmfi = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI);
for (i = 0; i < read_info->entries_cpu; i++, cpu++) {
/*
@@ -184,6 +173,20 @@ void sclp_facilities_setup(void)
break;
}
}
+
+ sclp_facilities.has_sop = sclp_feat_check(80, SCLP_FEAT_80_BIT_SOP);
+ sclp_facilities.has_gsls = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_GSLS);
+ sclp_facilities.has_esop = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_ESOP);
+ sclp_facilities.has_kss = sclp_feat_check(98, SCLP_FEAT_98_BIT_KSS);
+ sclp_facilities.has_cmma = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_CMMA);
+ sclp_facilities.has_64bscao = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_64BSCAO);
+ sclp_facilities.has_esca = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA);
+ sclp_facilities.has_ibs = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS);
+ sclp_facilities.has_pfmfi = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI);
+
+ if (read_info->offset_cpu <= 134)
+ return;
+ sclp_facilities.has_diag318 = read_info->byte_134_diag318;
}
/* Perform service call. Return 0 on success, non-zero otherwise. */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-21 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 11:31 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: snippets: Add reset_guest() to lib Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] s390x: sclp: Remove unnecessary padding from struct sclp_facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` Christoph Schlameuss [this message]
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] s390x: sclp: Use sclp_feat_check directly to read DIAG318 feature bit Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] s390x: sclp: Add detection of alternate STFLE facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260421-vsie-stfle-fac-v3-3-3cee84efefa3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox