Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	farman@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	vneethv@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:23:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615002309.052e0614.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612155407.199218-1-wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:54:07 +0200
William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
> subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
> detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
> rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
> in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
> react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
> and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
> cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
> attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
> virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
> -ENODEV.

Hi William!

Are you saying that ccw_device_start() started returning -EINVAL
since 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on
DNV")? Or did I somehow read the paragraph wrong?

The funcition ccw_device_start is documented to return:
 * Returns:                                                                     
 *  %0, if the operation was successful;                                        
 *  -%EBUSY, if the device is busy, or status pending;                          
 *  -%EACCES, if no path specified in @lpm is operational;                      
 *  -%ENODEV, if the device is not operational. 
and the commit message does not say a thing about introducing -EINVAL to
the mix.

Regards,
Halil 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-14 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
2026-06-12 16:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 22:05   ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615002309.052e0614.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wbezenah@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox