Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Omar Elghoul" <oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] s390/pci: Preserve FMB state in device re-enablement
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:06:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626180606.2EF961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626175525.37370-3-oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but there is a missing resource cleanup in `zpci_reenable_device()` on the `zpci_set_irq()` error path. If `zpci_set_irq()` fails, the function returns immediately without calling `zpci_disable_device()`, unlike the subsequent IOMMU registration error path. This leaves the device enabled in an inconsistent state.
--

commit 94bfdcea02e7e7dca9c322a0dc40fac61a9fb275
Author: Omar Elghoul <oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>

s390/pci: Preserve FMB state in device re-enablement

This commit introduces zpci_fmb_reenable_device() to check the FMB state and
ensure it is enabled. It resets the counters and handles re-enabling if the
FMB was already active.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> index 2910d4038d39c..1eb6aa772eb3f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -737,9 +765,13 @@ int zpci_reenable_device(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	rc = zpci_iommu_register_ioat(zdev, &status);
> -	if (rc)
> +	if (rc) {
>  		zpci_disable_device(zdev);
> +		return rc;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but there is a pre-existing issue
with resource cleanup in zpci_reenable_device().

If zpci_set_irq() fails earlier in this function:

        if (zdev->msi_nr_irqs > 0) {
                rc = zpci_set_irq(zdev);
                if (rc)
                        return rc;
        }

It returns immediately without calling zpci_disable_device(), unlike the
subsequent zpci_iommu_register_ioat() error path. Does this leave the device
enabled in the firmware but failed in Linux, rendering it unusable and
leaking its enabled state?

>  
> +	guard(mutex)(&zdev->fmb_lock);
> +	zpci_fmb_reenable_device(zdev);
>  	return rc;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260626175525.37370-1-oelghoul@linux.ibm.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-26 17:55 [PATCH v5 0/4] vfio-pci/zdev: Improved zPCI Function Measurement Support Omar Elghoul
2026-06-26 17:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] s390/pci: Hold fmb_lock when enabling or disabling PCI devices Omar Elghoul
2026-06-26 18:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 17:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] s390/pci: Preserve FMB state in device re-enablement Omar Elghoul
2026-06-26 18:06   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-26 17:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] s390/pci: Fence FMB enable/disable via debugfs for passthrough devices Omar Elghoul
2026-06-26 17:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] vfio-pci/zdev: Add VFIO FMB device features Omar Elghoul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260626180606.2EF961F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oelghoul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox