From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sechang Lim" <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net/smc: fix out-of-bounds read when sk_user_data holds a sk_psock
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:52:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630095216.E744F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629095140.679754-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Unconditional overwrite of sk_user_data during SMC fallback causes sk_psock memory leak and critical type confusion (control flow hijack).
--
commit c092e3d84654761aba7753030c182ca2840fc519
Author: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
net/smc: fix out-of-bounds read when sk_user_data holds a sk_psock
A passive-open child inherits the listener's smc_clcsock_data_ready callback.
This commit reserves the child's sk_user_data with a NULL pointer tagged
SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY to prevent sockmap from claiming the slot, and releases
it at accept.
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index b5db69073e20f..78f162344fe3a 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1786,6 +1791,9 @@ static int smc_clcsock_accept(struct smc_sock *lsmc, struct smc_sock **new_smc)
> if (lsmc->clcsk_error_report)
> new_clcsock->sk->sk_error_report = lsmc->clcsk_error_report;
> }
> + /* release the slot reserved in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() */
> + rcu_assign_sk_user_data(new_clcsock->sk, NULL);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does clearing this reservation to NULL
explicitly re-open the window for a BPF sockmap program to attach to the
socket during the subsequent SMC handshake?
If a BPF SOCK_OPS program attaches the established TCP socket to a sockmap,
sk_psock_init() can set sk_user_data to a new sk_psock and hijack the socket
callbacks. Should the SMC handshake fail and fall back to TCP, the fallback
path appears to blindly overwrite sk_user_data:
net/smc/af_smc.c:smc_fback_replace_callbacks() {
...
write_lock_bh(&clcsk->sk_callback_lock);
__rcu_assign_sk_user_data_with_flags(clcsk, smc, SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
...
}
Can this lead to a type confusion if the hijacked sockmap callbacks are left
active? When TCP data arrives, smc_fback_data_ready would forward to the
sockmap callback which dereferences sk_user_data expecting a struct sk_psock,
but receives a struct smc_sock instead.
> + write_unlock_bh(&new_clcsock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
>
> (*new_smc)->clcsock = new_clcsock;
> out:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629095140.679754-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 9:51 [PATCH net v3] net/smc: fix out-of-bounds read when sk_user_data holds a sk_psock Sechang Lim
2026-06-30 9:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630095216.E744F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox