From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:55:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630105543.1C08B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630104132.1598851-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Out-of-bounds read in `do_post_copy_validation` due to redundant and unsynchronized size fields (`num_queues` and `config_sz`) during fragmented migration stream writes.
- [Low] Use of the architecture-dependent type `size_t` in a binary structure intended for serialization.
- [Low] Severe mismatch between kernel-doc comments and actual structure fields in `vfio_ap_migration_data` and `vfio_ap_config`.
--
commit b64c84539884d50cda90f18a69a0a94397d84158
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration
This commit introduces the foundational data structures needed to facilitate
state transitions during vfio device migration for the s390 vfio-ap driver.
It adds structures for migration data, queue information, and AP configuration.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..239168c4b7fff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
[ ... ]
> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_migration_data - the data needed to migrate a guest with pass-through
> + * access to AP devices
> + *
> + * @mig_state: the current migration state
> + * @resuming_migf: the object used to resume the target guest
> + * @saving_migf: the object used to save the state of the source guest
> + */
> +struct vfio_ap_migration_data {
> + enum vfio_device_mig_state mig_state;
> +
> + struct {
> + struct file *filp;
> + struct vfio_ap_config *ap_config;
> + size_t config_sz;
> + } resuming_mig_state;
> +
> + struct file *stop_copy_mig_file;
> +};
[Severity: Low]
Are the kernel-doc fields for vfio_ap_migration_data out of sync with the
implementation? The comments document resuming_migf and saving_migf, but the
actual fields are resuming_mig_state and stop_copy_mig_file.
[ ... ]
> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_config - the guest's AP configuration
> + *
> + * @num_queues: the number of queues passed through to the guest
> + * @reserved: padding to ensure proper alignment of qinfo array
> + * @qinfo: an array of vfio_ap_queue_info objects, each specifying the
> + * queue information for a queue passed through to the guest
> + */
> +struct vfio_ap_config {
> + u32 num_queues;
> + u8 reserved[4];
> + size_t config_sz;
[Severity: Low]
Does the kernel-doc block for vfio_ap_config need an update to include the
config_sz field?
[Severity: Low]
Could the use of size_t here cause consistency issues? Since size_t has
variable width depending on the architecture, using it in a binary structure
intended for serialization over file descriptors or the network is generally
avoided in favor of fixed-width types.
[Severity: Critical]
Could having both num_queues and config_sz in this struct lead to an
out-of-bounds read later during migration?
If a fragmented migration stream write manipulates config_sz to be a smaller
value than expected, the validation checks in reallocate_ap_config() could be
bypassed:
reallocate_ap_config() {
cur_cfg_sz = ap_config->config_sz;
num_queues = ap_config->num_queues;
if (cur_cfg_sz >= sizeof(struct vfio_ap_config)) {
...
} else {
new_cfg_sz = cur_cfg_sz + len;
}
}
This could cause an out-of-bounds read in do_post_copy_validation() when
looping num_queues times over the qinfo array:
queues_available_on_target_system() {
for (int i = 0; i < source_config->num_queues; i++) {
apqn = source_config->qinfo[i].apqn;
...
}
Is it possible to synchronize these fields or derive the size directly from
num_queues to prevent a mismatch?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630104132.1598851-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 10:41 [PATCH v3 00/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration support Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Provide function to get the number of queues assigned to mdev Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] s390/vfio-ap: Initialize/release vfio device migration data Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: Reset migration state in VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl handler Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] s390-vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to save the vfio device migration state Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RESUMING Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add method to set a new guest AP configuration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to resume the vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state to STOP Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RUNNING and vice versa Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get the size of data to be migrated during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add 'migratable' feature to sysfs 'features' attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration chapter to vfio-ap.rst Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630105543.1C08B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox