From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bryam Vargas" <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/iucv: fix use-after-free of a severed iucv_path
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:01:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708070104.2EBEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707-b4-disp-783fedbb-v1-1-463b9dbda2ea@proton.me>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent Use-After-Free of `iucv_path` due to incorrect ordering of queue cleanup and path freeing in `iucv_sever_path()`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net] net/iucv: fix use-after-free of a severed iucv_path ---
commit 9139c973711b1b0860aa18a8e778aceb20d5b1dd
Author: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
net/iucv: fix use-after-free of a severed iucv_path
This commit drops queued message notifications in iucv->message_q when an
IUCV path is severed. It acquires the message_q.lock and frees any remaining
notifications that reference the severed path to prevent use-after-free
during a later recvmsg().
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705-b4-disp-fc79c0dc-v1-1-d2cdcb57afa9@proton.me?part=1
> diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> index fed240b453bd9..2869a103f7fa2 100644
> --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -348,6 +349,19 @@ static void iucv_sever_path(struct sock *sk, int with_user_data)
> } else
> pr_iucv->path_sever(path, NULL);
> iucv_path_free(path);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does freeing the path before clearing
the queue leave a race window for a concurrent receive?
If a concurrent recvmsg() is running, it could acquire the message_q.lock
and pop a notification containing the freed path pointer before we acquire
the lock here to clear the queue:
CPU1 in iucv_sever_path():
iucv_path_free(path);
// preempted or delayed before acquiring message_q.lock
CPU2 in iucv_sock_recvmsg():
// pops notification from message_q
iucv_process_message_q()
iucv_process_message(sk, skb, p->path, &p->msg);
__iucv_message_receive()
parm->db.ippathid = path->pathid; // use-after-free read
Would it be safer to move iucv_path_free(path) after the spin_unlock_bh
block that drops the queued notifications?
> +
> + /*
> + * Message notifications queued on message_q still reference
> + * the now freed path; drop them, otherwise a later recvmsg()
> + * would pass the freed iucv_path to message_receive() via
> + * iucv_process_message_q().
> + */
> + spin_lock_bh(&iucv->message_q.lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &iucv->message_q.list, list) {
> + list_del(&p->list);
> + kfree(p);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&iucv->message_q.lock);
> }
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707-b4-disp-783fedbb-v1-1-463b9dbda2ea@proton.me?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 7:00 [PATCH net] net/iucv: fix use-after-free of a severed iucv_path Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 7:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708070104.2EBEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox