From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/22] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:19:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710161945.GO118978@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq5ajyr3h106.fsf@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 10:52:49AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> > /*
> >> > * For host memory encryption and device requiring unencrypted DMA,
> >> > * MMIO memory is treated as shared by default.
> >> > */
> >> > if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO) {
> >> > if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) || force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
> >> > attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
> >> > }
> >>
> >> Yes, I think it does the trick, preserves the current semantics for AMD.
> >> I guess you could use a single 'if' for all checks (up to you).
> >
> > Please don't change it, MMIO P2P is broken on CC systems today and it
> > should stay broken. Passing DMA_ATTR_MMIO with DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED is
> > an error that we need to correct in the drivers not make work in the
> > core code.
> >
>
> But the above changes are intended to handle HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT. In v7, we
> had the following diff:
To follow how the rest of the decrypted/encrypted stuff works the MMIO
has to be flaged with CC_SHARED for HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT too, just like
the PTEs.
> @@ -88,37 +88,40 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
> {
> dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>
> + /*
> + * For a device requiring unencrypted DMA, MMIO memory is treated
> + * as shared by default.
> + */
> + if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO))
> + attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
force_dma_unencrypted() says nothing about the properties of the
address passed in, this was nonsense :\
> As we discussed [1], that can come in a later patch. In the meantime, adding
> the HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT check preserves the previous behavior for SME.
It never worked. When we added ATTR_MMIO it started to have a chance
to work but prior to that it was always broken anyhow. I don't see
there is much merit in preserving the narrow window when we
inadvertantly had a half working ATTR_MMIO.
But if you really want to it should be
cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) *only* and get rid of the wrong
force_dma_unencrypted().
But IMHO, I'd rather this series treat ATTR_MMIO as private MMIO and
ATTR_MMIO|CC_SHARED as shared MMIO and that's the right and correct
thing for the DMA API.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 5:49 [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 01/22] dma-direct: return struct page from dma_direct_alloc_from_pool() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 02/22] dma-pool: fix page leak in atomic_pool_expand() cleanup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 03/22] iommu/dma: Check atomic pool allocation result directly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 04/22] dma: free atomic pool pages by physical address Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 05/22] swiotlb: Preserve allocation virtual address for dynamic pools Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 06/22] s390: Expose protected virtualization through cc_platform_has() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 07/22] dma-direct: swiotlb: handle swiotlb alloc/free outside __dma_direct_alloc_pages Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 08/22] coco: arm64: s390: powerpc: Mark secure guests with CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-07 15:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-07-07 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 09/22] dma-mapping: Add internal shared allocation attribute Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 10/22] dma-direct: use __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED in alloc/free paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 11/22] dma-pool: track decrypted atomic pools and select them via attrs Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 12/22] dma: swiotlb: pass mapping attributes by reference Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 13/22] dma: swiotlb: track pool encryption state and honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 14/22] dma-mapping: make dma_pgprot() honor __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 15/22] dma-direct: pass attrs to dma_capable() for DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED checks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 16/22] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 11:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-08 15:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-08 17:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-09 11:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-09 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 5:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-10 16:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-07-08 12:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 17/22] dma-direct: set decrypted flag for remapped DMA allocations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 18/22] dma-direct: select DMA address encoding from __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 19/22] dma-direct: rename ret to cpu_addr in alloc helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 20/22] dma: swiotlb: free dynamic pools from process context Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 21/22] dma: swiotlb: handle set_memory_decrypted() failures Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 22/22] swiotlb: remove unused SWIOTLB_FORCE flag Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-07 8:06 ` [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-07 13:03 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-07-10 10:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710161945.GO118978@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox