From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:58:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713155806.7740D1F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713150857.269954-5-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Data race and double-decrement of `cmma_dirty_pages` due to two-pass CMMA cleanup
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot ---
commit 119121acc5129e77726627587bbb91e16dea4543
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot
This patch fixes inaccurate dirty tracking during migration by appropriately
decrementing the cmma-dirty counter when a memslot is removed. It does this
by walking the page tables and decrementing the counter prior to deleting
the slot.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 9e3b8b5c6aa66..5c2408fc5a8cb 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5796,11 +5796,19 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static long cmma_d_count_pte(union pte *ptep, gfn_t gfn, gfn_t next, struct dat_walk *walk)
> +{
> + if (pgste_of(ptep)->cmma_d)
> + atomic64_dec(walk->priv);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[Severity: High]
Can this two-pass CMMA cleanup cause a double-decrement of the global counter?
The first pass in cmma_d_count_pte() locklessly reads cmma_d and decrements
the counter, but leaves cmma_d = 1.
> void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
> const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
> enum kvm_mr_change change)
> {
> + const struct dat_walk_ops ops = { .pte_entry = cmma_d_count_pte, };
> struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache *mc = NULL;
> int rc = 0;
>
> @@ -5814,6 +5822,12 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> }
>
> scoped_guard(write_lock, &kvm->mmu_lock) {
> + if (kvm->arch.migration_mode && kvm->arch.use_cmma) {
> + _dat_walk_gfn_range(old->base_gfn, old->base_gfn + old->npages,
> + kvm->arch.gmap->asce, &ops, DAT_WALK_IGN_HOLES,
> + &kvm->arch.cmma_dirty_pages);
> + }
> +
> switch (change) {
> case KVM_MR_DELETE:
> rc = dat_delete_slot(mc, kvm->arch.gmap->asce, old->base_gfn, old->npages);
[Severity: High]
The wide window between the first walk here (decrementing) and the second walk
in dat_delete_slot() (which clears cmma_d) appears to allow a concurrent
KVM_S390_GET_CMMA_BITS ioctl to intervene.
Since the ioctl takes slots_arch_lock but not mmu_lock, could it acquire the
PGSTE lock, observe cmma_d == 1, clear it, and decrement the
cmma_dirty_pages counter a second time for the same page?
If this happens, the counter would underflow and wrap to UINT64_MAX, causing
KVM_S390_GET_CMMA_BITS to permanently report pending dirty pages and break VM
live migration.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713150857.269954-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 15:08 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: s390: Return -EFAULT instead of PGM_ADDRESSING Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713155806.7740D1F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox