Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	tj@kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 14/14] RDMA/selftests: Add rxe_netns_names test
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:30:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715143046.020451F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714142927.1298897-15-jiri@resnulli.us>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Asynchronous RXE device deletion causes race conditions and test failures.
- [Medium] Asynchronous network namespace deletion causes test teardown to permanently leak the exclusive netns mode.
--

--- Patch [14]: [PATCH rdma-next v2 14/14] RDMA/selftests: Add rxe_netns_names test ---
commit dcc30384e696a4047f319e3b7139b30b3ddc09f4
Author: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>

RDMA/selftests: Add rxe_netns_names test

Add a kselftest script that exercises per-netns RDMA device naming
with RXE. Cover duplicate names across namespaces, move conflict
handling, move-with-rename, and same-namespace rename requests.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rdma/rxe_netns_names.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rdma/rxe_netns_names.sh
> new file mode 100755
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rdma/rxe_netns_names.sh

[ ... ]

> +cleanup_devs()
> +{
> +	ip link del "$DUMMY_A" 2>/dev/null
> +	ip link del "$DUMMY_B" 2>/dev/null
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause race conditions between test iterations?

The ip link del command returns as soon as the netdev reference is dropped,
but the rdma_rxe driver handles the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event by scheduling an
asynchronous unregistration of the RDMA device via
ib_unregister_device_queued().

Could the next test iteration fail with -EEXIST when attempting to create or
rename a device to the exact same name (like $RXE_SAME) if the asynchronous
device_del() from the previous test hasn't finished?

[ ... ]

> +cleanup()
> +{
> +	cleanup_devs
> +
> +	ip netns del "$NS1" 2>/dev/null
> +	ip netns del "$NS2" 2>/dev/null
> +
> +	if [ "$MODE_CHANGED" -eq 1 ]; then
> +		rdma system set netns "$OLD_MODE" 2>/dev/null
> +	fi

[Severity: Medium]
Does this cleanup sequence permanently leak the exclusive netns mode?

The ip netns del command initiates asynchronous teardown by queuing
net_cleanup_work. If rdma system set netns "$OLD_MODE" is executed
immediately afterwards while the namespaces are still in the process of being
destroyed, the kernel might reject the mode change with -EBUSY.

Since the script redirects errors to /dev/null, it seems the system's RDMA
subsystem could permanently be left in exclusive mode instead of being
restored to its original shared mode.

> +
> +	for m in "${MODS[@]}"; do
> +		modprobe -r "$m" 2>/dev/null
> +	done
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714142927.1298897-1-jiri@resnulli.us?part=14

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 14:29 [PATCH rdma-next v2 00/14] RDMA: Make device names unique per net namespace Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 01/14] RDMA/core: Pass the net namespace to the device name lookups Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 02/14] RDMA/core: Handle device name conflicts when changing net namespace Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 03/14] RDMA/core: Support renaming a device when changing its " Jiri Pirko
2026-07-15 14:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 04/14] RDMA/nldev: Report net namespace move errors through extack Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 05/14] RDMA/nldev: Allow setting the device name while changing net namespace Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 06/14] net/smc: Look up the pnetid ib device within the " Jiri Pirko
2026-07-15 14:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 07/14] RDMA/srp: Make the SRP sysfs class net namespace aware Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 08/14] RDMA/cgroup: Disambiguate devices across net namespaces Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 09/14] RDMA/cma: Document that CM configfs cannot be net namespace scoped Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 10/14] RDMA/core: Document the SELinux ibendport net namespace limitation Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 11/14] RDMA/core: Make device names unique per net namespace Jiri Pirko
2026-07-15 14:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 12/14] RDMA/rxe: Allow queue VMAs to outlive ucontexts Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 13/14] RDMA/rxe: Implement disassociate_ucontext callback Jiri Pirko
2026-07-14 14:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 14/14] RDMA/selftests: Add rxe_netns_names test Jiri Pirko
2026-07-15 14:30   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715143046.020451F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox