Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: use proper PTE accessors in madvise() and mremap()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:53:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717135306.E8C571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c4d3c768ebf9cc7bbc7667e0e08bf5ad2fe8729.1784292223.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Calling `set_pte()` on an uninitialized stack variable causes undefined behavior, stack memory reads, and potential kernel panics.
--

--- Patch [1]: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: use proper PTE accessors in madvise() and mremap() ---
commit 75c34d0a3dcbb3f5f12f6bd64e11ac6572b6f8f8
Author: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

mm: use proper PTE accessors in madvise() and mremap()

This commit converts direct page table entry pointer dereferences to use
the proper accessors in madvise() and mremap().

> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 07a21ca31bad4..77508ef1c1836 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static int guard_install_set_pte(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
>  	unsigned long *nr_pages = (unsigned long *)walk->private;
>  
>  	/* Simply install a PTE marker, this causes segfault on access. */
> -	*ptep = make_pte_marker(PTE_MARKER_GUARD);
> +	set_pte(ptep, make_pte_marker(PTE_MARKER_GUARD));

[Severity: Critical]
Is it safe to use set_pte() here?  In this code path, ptep is an out-parameter
pointing to an uninitialized stack variable rather than a live page table
entry.  This can be seen in the caller walk_pte_range_inner() in mm/pagewalk.c:

	pte_t new_pte;
	err = ops->install_pte(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE, &new_pte, walk);

Because ptep points to the stack and not a live page table, this violates the
architectural API contracts of set_pte().  For example, on arm64, set_pte()
calls __ptep_get() which reads the uninitialized stack memory and passes it to
WARN_ON_ONCE(). On other architectures like Xen PV or PowerPC, set_pte() expects
a live page table mapping and can trigger hypercalls or specific cache flushes
using a stack address, potentially leading to crashes or unpredictable behavior.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1784292223.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 13:32 [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm: introduce __ptent sparse attribute Alexander Gordeev
2026-07-17 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: use proper PTE accessors in madvise() and mremap() Alexander Gordeev
2026-07-17 13:53   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 17:14   ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-07-17 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce ptep_get_nopgtable() and set_pte_nopgtable() accessors Alexander Gordeev
2026-07-17 14:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm: introduce __ptent sparse attribute Alexander Gordeev
2026-07-17 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] s390/mm: implement __ptent-aware pte_t type Alexander Gordeev
2026-07-17 13:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm: introduce __ptent sparse attribute David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717135306.E8C571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox