From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jaehoon Kim" <jhkim@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:47:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720224740.0A4EF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720222238.1576-1-jhkim@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] UAPI breakage: `kvm_s390_adapter_map` returns success for file-backed memory without recording the mapping, causing `kvm_s390_adapter_unmap` to fail with `-ENOENT`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl ---
commit a05b3db94a2a5dc18d9aa3a80842bcd850efd72d
Author: Jaehoon Kim <jhkim@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl
This commit adds a fallback to short-term pinning in kvm_s390_adapter_map()
when FOLL_LONGTERM pinning fails, such as for file-backed memory. If the
short-term pin succeeds, it unpins the page and returns success so the
non-atomic irqfd path can handle interrupt injection.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 9e3e6b0d72ad6..4b68e0cb51f6e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -2520,8 +2520,19 @@ static int kvm_s390_adapter_map(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id, __u64 addr)
> map->addr = host_addr;
> map->page = pin_map_page(kvm, host_addr, FOLL_LONGTERM);
> if (!map->page) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> + /*
> + * Long-term pinning may fail for memory types such as file-backed
> + * memory. Check whether short-term pinning is possible so that the
> + * non-atomic irqfd path can handle interrupt injection.
> + */
> + map->page = pin_map_page(kvm, host_addr, 0);
> + if (!map->page) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + unpin_user_page(map->page);
> + kfree(map);
> + return 0;
[Severity: High]
Does returning 0 here break UAPI symmetry?
Since the function returns success without adding the mapping to the
adapter->maps list, a later call to kvm_s390_adapter_unmap() for this
successfully mapped address will fail to find it and return -ENOENT:
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:kvm_s390_adapter_unmap() {
...
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->maps_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(map, tmp, &adapter->maps, list) {
if (map->guest_addr == addr) {
found = true;
...
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->maps_lock, flags);
return found ? 0 : -ENOENT;
}
Could this cause userspace hypervisors like QEMU to abort or fail device
cleanup and migration when the unmap ioctl unexpectedly fails?
> }
> spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->maps_lock, flags);
> if (adapter->nr_maps < MAX_S390_ADAPTER_MAPS) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720222238.1576-1-jhkim@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 22:22 [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl Jaehoon Kim
2026-07-20 22:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 22:55 ` Douglas Freimuth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720224740.0A4EF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jhkim@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox