From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: dengler@linux.ibm.com, fcallies@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com
Cc: freude@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729095318.184141-3-freude@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729095318.184141-1-freude@linux.ibm.com>
The xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input
validation, creating security vulnerabilities:
1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could
overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized
buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking.
2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from
userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized
buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure
fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain.
3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and
data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling
buffer overflows.
Fix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary
checks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before
copying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c | 78 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c
index 40f72cdf284d..fb37e28c8242 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c
@@ -342,49 +342,40 @@ static int xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx(bool userspace, struct ap_message *ap_msg,
};
} __packed * msg = ap_msg->msg;
- int rcblen = CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length);
- int req_sumlen, resp_sumlen;
- char *req_data = ap_msg->msg + sizeof(struct type6_hdr) + rcblen;
- char *function_code;
+ size_t req_cblen, rep_cblen, req_sumlen, rep_sumlen;
+ char *function_code, *req_data;
- if (CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length) <
- xcrb->request_control_blk_length)
- return -EINVAL; /* overflow after alignment*/
-
- /* length checks */
+ /* request length and overflow checks */
+ if (xcrb->request_control_blk_length < sizeof(struct CPRBX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ req_cblen = CEIL4((size_t)xcrb->request_control_blk_length);
+ if (req_cblen > U32_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
ap_msg->len = sizeof(struct type6_hdr) +
- CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length) +
- xcrb->request_data_length;
+ req_cblen + xcrb->request_data_length;
if (ap_msg->len > ap_msg->bufsize)
return -EINVAL;
-
- /*
- * Overflow check
- * sum must be greater (or equal) than the largest operand
- */
- req_sumlen = CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length) +
- xcrb->request_data_length;
- if ((CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length) <=
- xcrb->request_data_length) ?
+ req_sumlen = req_cblen + xcrb->request_data_length;
+ if (req_sumlen > U32_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (req_cblen <= xcrb->request_data_length ?
req_sumlen < xcrb->request_data_length :
- req_sumlen < CEIL4(xcrb->request_control_blk_length)) {
+ req_sumlen < req_cblen) {
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (CEIL4(xcrb->reply_control_blk_length) <
- xcrb->reply_control_blk_length)
- return -EINVAL; /* overflow after alignment*/
-
- /*
- * Overflow check
- * sum must be greater (or equal) than the largest operand
- */
- resp_sumlen = CEIL4(xcrb->reply_control_blk_length) +
- xcrb->reply_data_length;
- if ((CEIL4(xcrb->reply_control_blk_length) <=
- xcrb->reply_data_length) ?
- resp_sumlen < xcrb->reply_data_length :
- resp_sumlen < CEIL4(xcrb->reply_control_blk_length)) {
+ /* reply length and overflow checks */
+ if (xcrb->reply_control_blk_length < sizeof(struct CPRBX))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ rep_cblen = CEIL4((size_t)xcrb->reply_control_blk_length);
+ if (rep_cblen > U32_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ rep_sumlen = rep_cblen + xcrb->reply_data_length;
+ if (rep_sumlen > U32_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (rep_cblen <= xcrb->reply_data_length ?
+ rep_sumlen < xcrb->reply_data_length :
+ rep_sumlen < rep_cblen) {
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -393,7 +384,7 @@ static int xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx(bool userspace, struct ap_message *ap_msg,
memcpy(msg->hdr.agent_id, &xcrb->agent_ID, sizeof(xcrb->agent_ID));
msg->hdr.tocardlen1 = xcrb->request_control_blk_length;
if (xcrb->request_data_length) {
- msg->hdr.offset2 = msg->hdr.offset1 + rcblen;
+ msg->hdr.offset2 = msg->hdr.offset1 + req_cblen;
msg->hdr.tocardlen2 = xcrb->request_data_length;
}
msg->hdr.fromcardlen1 = xcrb->reply_control_blk_length;
@@ -404,8 +395,8 @@ static int xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx(bool userspace, struct ap_message *ap_msg,
xcrb->request_control_blk_addr,
xcrb->request_control_blk_length))
return -EFAULT;
- if (msg->cprbx.cprb_len + sizeof(msg->hdr.function_code) >
- xcrb->request_control_blk_length)
+ /* copy subfunction code into AP msg type 6 function code field */
+ if (msg->cprbx.cprb_len > req_cblen - sizeof(msg->hdr.function_code))
return -EINVAL;
function_code = ((unsigned char *)&msg->cprbx) + msg->cprbx.cprb_len;
memcpy(msg->hdr.function_code, function_code,
@@ -437,10 +428,13 @@ static int xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx(bool userspace, struct ap_message *ap_msg,
}
/* copy data block */
- if (xcrb->request_data_length &&
- z_copy_from_user(userspace, req_data, xcrb->request_data_address,
- xcrb->request_data_length))
- return -EFAULT;
+ if (xcrb->request_data_length) {
+ req_data = ap_msg->msg + sizeof(struct type6_hdr) + req_cblen;
+ if (z_copy_from_user(userspace, req_data,
+ xcrb->request_data_address,
+ xcrb->request_data_length))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 9:53 [PATCH v7 0/5] Improve code in zcrypt msg type 6 handling Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 9:53 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] s390/zcrypt: Fix CPRB memory allocation in zcrypt misc code Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 10:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 13:56 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 9:53 ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2026-07-29 10:40 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 9:53 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 " Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 9:53 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 CPRB domain handling with ASN.1 parsing Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 9:53 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] s390/zcrypt: Pad trailing CCA or EP11 message with zeros Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 11:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729095318.184141-3-freude@linux.ibm.com \
--to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox