From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Harald Freudenberger" <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] s390/zcrypt: Fix CPRB memory allocation in zcrypt misc code
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:52:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729145251.92AC01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729143928.191969-2-freude@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incomplete memory scrubbing in `free_cprbmem()` due to missing 4-byte alignment rounding.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v8 1/5] s390/zcrypt: Fix CPRB memory allocation in zcrypt misc code ---
commit 8719946bc97657e1ca3c996d1d00474456aa0ef0
Author: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
s390/zcrypt: Fix CPRB memory allocation in zcrypt misc code
Both CPRB alloc functions in zcrypt_ccamisc.c and zcrypt_ep11misc.c
did not round up the memory allocation to a multiple of 4 bytes as it
is needed by the zcrypt layer to process the CPRBs.
Now the alloc_and_prep_cprbmem() and alloc_cprbmem() functions
guarantee that the base CPRB struct and a possible parameter block are
aligned to a 4-byte boundary and the backing memory allocation is
rounded up to the next multiple of 4 byte. Also the free_cprbmem() is
updated and scrubs the rounded up amount of memory.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> index 3dda9589f2b95..e604c100ccce2 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
> @@ -355,21 +356,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ep11_check_aes_key);
>
> /*
> * Allocate and prepare ep11 cprb plus additional payload.
> + * It is guaranteed that the memory is aligned to a 4 byte boundary.
> + * Furthermore the memory allocation is rounded up to the next
> + * multiple of 4 bytes (with taking the payload_len into account).
> */
> static void *alloc_cprbmem(size_t payload_len, u32 xflags)
> {
> - size_t len = sizeof(struct ep11_cprb) + payload_len;
> + size_t memlen = ALIGN(sizeof(struct ep11_cprb) + payload_len, 4);
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states that free_cprbmem() is updated to scrub the rounded
up amount of memory. While this change is present for zcrypt_ccamisc.c, was it
missed for zcrypt_ep11misc.c?
Since alloc_cprbmem() now allocates the rounded up memory size, does
free_cprbmem() in zcrypt_ep11misc.c also need to be updated to scrub the
matching size?
Currently, it still uses the exact unrounded size:
static void free_cprbmem(void *mem, size_t payload_len, bool scrub, u32 xflags)
{
if (mem && scrub)
memzero_explicit(mem, sizeof(struct ep11_cprb) + payload_len);
Could this leave up to 3 bytes of the newly added padding unscrubbed when an
EP11 CPRB is freed? If the cryptographic hardware writes sensitive data into
the padding bytes of a 4-byte aligned response, this data would not be zeroed
before the memory is returned to the allocator.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729143928.191969-1-freude@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 14:39 [PATCH v8 0/5] Improve code in zcrypt msg type 6 handling Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:39 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] s390/zcrypt: Fix CPRB memory allocation in zcrypt misc code Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 15:10 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:39 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:11 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:39 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 " Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:39 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] s390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 CPRB domain handling with ASN.1 parsing Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:25 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 14:39 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] s390/zcrypt: Pad trailing CCA or EP11 message with zeros Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-29 15:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729145251.92AC01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox