From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:12:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805141216.382B01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805133627.1216607-4-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing lock acquisition in zpci_remove_reserved_devices() leading to lockdep failure and state corruption.
- [High] Race condition in zpci_event_avail_new_device() exposing an unlocked device to concurrent state changes.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS ---
commit f14ecb575360924ecbbf3801f2b0b0e2ff3a2eeb
Author: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS
This commit enables CONTEXT_ANALYSIS in the s390 PCI Makefile since the
code now compiles without warnings.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/Makefile b/arch/s390/pci/Makefile
> index 1810e0944a4ed..b8be1316491b8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/Makefile
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> # Makefile for the s390 PCI subsystem.
> #
>
> +CONTEXT_ANALYSIS := y
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue and was not introduced by the patch under
review, but since context analysis is being enabled to catch locking issues,
I noticed a missing lock acquisition that it might not be catching.
In arch/s390/pci/pci.c:zpci_remove_reserved_devices():
list_for_each_entry_safe(zdev, tmp, &remove, entry)
zpci_device_reserved(zdev);
The function zpci_device_reserved() unconditionally asserts
lockdep_assert_held(&zdev->state_lock). Will calling it here without
holding zdev->state_lock lead to a lockdep failure or state corruption
if accessed concurrently by sysfs or event handlers?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue not introduced by the patch under
review, but there might be a race condition exposed here as well.
In arch/s390/pci/pci_event.c:zpci_event_avail_new_device():
if (zpci_add_device(zdev)) {
kfree(zdev);
break;
}
zpci_scan_configured_device(zdev, ccdf->fh);
Once zpci_add_device() publishes the device globally, can concurrent
threads acquire zdev->state_lock and deconfigure the device while
zpci_scan_configured_device() is still running unlocked?
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o pci_irq.o pci_clp.o \
> pci_event.o pci_debug.o pci_insn.o pci_mmio.o \
> pci_bus.o pci_kvm_hook.o pci_report.o pci_fixup.o
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805133627.1216607-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 13:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS Heiko Carstens
2026-08-05 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] s390/pci: Rework __zpci_event_error() to remove conditional locking Heiko Carstens
2026-08-05 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/pci: Rework __zpci_event_availability() " Heiko Carstens
2026-08-05 14:01 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-08-05 14:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/pci: Enable CONTEXT_ANALYSIS Heiko Carstens
2026-08-05 14:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805141216.382B01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox