From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Farhan Ali" <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:07:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805170759.3432E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805165518.794-6-alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing error check on PCI_COMMAND read leads to permanent register corruption and unintended device enablement on transient PCI errors.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages ---
commit 6d8ddd25b8ed47c23845049339a3c29cd4e53440
Author: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages
This commit temporarily enables the Memory bit in the Command register
before writing MSI-X messages to prevent Unsupported Request errors.
It then restores the original Command register state afterwards.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> index 209373c92e9e1..79c7e84d314b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -879,6 +880,14 @@ void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, 0,
> PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
>
> + /*
> + * The restored device state may not have Memory decoding enabled
> + * in the Command register. Since the MSI-X was enabled for the
> + * device, enable Memory decoding before restoring MSI-X.
> + */
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
[Severity: High]
If the device is inaccessible or experiencing a transient error (e.g., an AER
link reset), can this read fail and set cmd to 0xFFFF?
Looking at pci_read_config_word(), it uses PCI_SET_ERROR_RESPONSE() on failure:
int pci_read_config_word(const struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *val)
{
if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev)) {
PCI_SET_ERROR_RESPONSE(val);
return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
}
...
}
If cmd is set to 0xFFFF, the subsequent pci_write_config_word() will write
0xFFFF back to the Command register.
Does this unintentionally enable all device capabilities, including Bus
Mastering (which could lead to rogue DMA) and SERR#?
Should we check the return value of pci_read_config_word() before writing?
> +
> write_msg = arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
>
> scoped_guard (msi_descs_lock, &dev->dev) {
[ ... ]
> @@ -889,6 +898,7 @@ void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
[Severity: High]
If cmd was populated with the error response 0xFFFF, does this write
permanently commit the corrupted state back to the device?
> pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL, 0);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805165518.794-1-alifm@linux.ibm.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 16:55 [PATCH v23 0/5] [PCI] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 1/5] PCI: Introduce PCI_SLOT_PLACEHOLDER constant for slot_nr placeholder value Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 17:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 2/5] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots to fix slot reset on s390 Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 17:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 3/5] PCI: Avoid saving config space state if inaccessible Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 17:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 4/5] PCI: Fail FLR when config space is inaccessible Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 17:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:55 ` [PATCH v23 5/5] PCI/MSI: Enable memory decoding before restoring MSI-X messages Farhan Ali
2026-08-05 17:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805170759.3432E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox