From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] s390/vfio-ap: fix stale pqap_hook pointer on error in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm()
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:18:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806141848.4F3061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806140342.611294-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Host AP configuration changes trigger a NULL pointer dereference when accessing unassigned matrix mediated devices.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v4] s390/vfio-ap: fix stale pqap_hook pointer on error in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm() ---
commit aef5cc63216cb49a3fd8ebd1da1a8d39b4fabb7b
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: fix stale pqap_hook pointer on error in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm()
In vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(), kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook is set to
&matrix_mdev->pqap_hook before the update locks are acquired and the
mdev list is checked for a conflicting assignment. If another mdev is
already attached to the same KVM instance, the function returns -EPERM
without restoring the hook pointer. This patch rearranges lock acquisition
to prevent this stale pointer issue and potential deadlocks.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 44b3a1dcc1b36..99a0efd999ef9 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1883,18 +1881,15 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> struct kvm *kvm = matrix_mdev->kvm;
>
> if (kvm && kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd) {
> - down_write(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> - kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> - up_write(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> -
> get_update_locks_for_kvm(kvm);
> + kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
>
> kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(kvm);
> vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev);
> - kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
>
> release_update_locks_for_kvm(kvm);
> + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> }
> }
While reviewing this file, I noticed a couple of related issues.
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c:vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove() {
...
list_for_each_entry(matrix_mdev, &matrix_dev->mdev_list, node) {
mutex_lock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if a mediated device is unassigned
(matrix_mdev->kvm is NULL) when the host AP configuration is modified,
will this unconditional lock of matrix_mdev->kvm->lock trigger a NULL pointer
dereference?
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c:vfio_ap_mdev_hot_plug_cfg() {
...
DECLARE_BITMAP(apm_filtered, AP_DEVICES);
bool filter_domains, filter_adapters, filter_cdoms, do_hotplug = false;
mutex_lock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but similar to the above, does this
function also dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking if it's NULL,
potentially leading to a crash when unassigned matrix mediated devices are
accessed during host AP configuration changes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806140342.611294-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 14:03 [PATCH v4] s390/vfio-ap: fix stale pqap_hook pointer on error in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm() Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-06 14:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 18:13 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-06 19:18 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-06 14:28 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-06 14:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806141848.4F3061F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox