Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs()
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:55:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812105557.E4D621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812104436.109741-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference due to a TOCTOU data race on `gi->origin`.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() ---
commit b1b05a4cfd3db133f1eddf2ecf286b6b12e10c50
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs()

This commit modifies the reporting of floating interrupts to userspace 
to use a non-destructive test. It ensures that the GISA IPM bits are 
not inadvertently cleared and lost if the userspace output buffer is 
too small.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2242,7 +2247,7 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
>  				ret = -ENOMEM;
>  				goto out_nolock;
>  			}
> -			if (gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(gi->origin, i)) {
> +			if (gisa_test_ipm_gisc(gi->origin, i)) {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for gi->origin to be
dereferenced as NULL here?

Looking at get_all_floating_irqs(), gi->origin is accessed multiple times
without lock protection or READ_ONCE(). The pointer is initially checked
earlier in the function:

    if (gi->origin && gisa_get_ipm(gi->origin)) {

and then accessed repeatedly inside the loop for each ISC.

Could the compiler reload the gi->origin pointer from memory between the
initial check and these loop iterations?

If a concurrent KVM_PV_ENABLE ioctl is invoked, it can execute
kvm_s390_pv_init_vm() -> kvm_s390_cpus_to_pv() -> kvm_s390_gisa_disable() ->
kvm_s390_gisa_destroy(), which sets gi->origin = NULL.

Since the KVM_DEV_FLIC_GET_ALL_IRQS ioctl does not hold kvm->lock, could
this concurrent clearing lead to a NULL pointer dereference if the compiler
reloads gi->origin inside the loop?

>  				irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *) &buf[n];
>  				irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_IO(1, 0, 0, 0);
>  				irq->u.io.io_int_word = isc_to_int_word(i);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812104436.109741-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 10:44 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: s390: And then... even more fixes again Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: s390: Properly handle NULL pointer in dat_cond_set_storage_key() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: s390: Use srcu in kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:02   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:55   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 10:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 14:06   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 11:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:03   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 11:37     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: s390: Fix pgste_get_trylock_multiple() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:11   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: s390: Fix IRQ injection with SIGP Stop and Store Status Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 12:59   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:11     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 13:23       ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_clear_pv_state() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:02   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: s390: Fix potential tiny kernel stack leak Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:14   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 11:47   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812105557.E4D621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox