From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:34:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812123431.12BE01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812115139.576303-10-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Software resources (KVM GISC registration and pinned guest memory) are permanently leaked if hardware reset fails unexpectedly.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v3 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config ---
commit b591517cf03c156d327043d4900cb31e47ff080b
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config
When an adapter or domain is removed from the host's AP configuration,
vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() can bypass resetting the queue. This patch fixes
a leak of KVM GISC resources and pinned guest memory by calling
vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() if the adapter or domain is no longer in the
matrix configuration.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 3652ba792be73..faab5e9179ff1 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -2507,12 +2507,15 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
> /*
> * If the queue is not in the host's AP configuration, then resetting
> * it will fail with response code 01, (APQN not valid); so, let's make
> - * sure it is in the host's config.
> + * sure it is in the host's config. If it is not, then free the KVM GISC
> + * resources.
> */
> if (test_bit_inv(apid, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.apm) &&
> test_bit_inv(apqi, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.aqm)) {
> vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() leak
software resources (KVM GISC registration and pinned guest memory) if
hardware reset fails unexpectedly?
In vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(), if ap_zapq() returns an unexpected response
code, the default case is hit:
default:
WARN(true,
"PQAP/ZAPQ for %02x.%04x failed with invalid rc=%u\n",
AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
status.response_code);
}
This default path returns without queuing the reset work or calling
vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources().
A similar situation occurs in the asynchronous worker thread apq_reset_check()
if ap_tapq() returns an unexpected response code:
ret = apq_status_check(q->apqn, &status);
if (ret == -EIO)
return;
Since vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() continues on to call kfree(q) regardless of
the outcome of vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue():
dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
kfree(q);
release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
Are these resources permanently lost when this happens?
> flush_work(&q->reset_work);
> + } else {
> + vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);
> }
>
> done:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812115139.576303-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 11:51 [PATCH v3 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 16:05 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 15:46 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 16:24 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 16:05 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-12 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 15:36 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-12 15:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812123431.12BE01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox