Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] mips: Get rid of custom mips ABIs for syscall tables
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:49:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812174956.0A5031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812-tonyk-syscall_table-v5-8-3d383927c609@igalia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch modifies `arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl` (changing the ABI string to `common`) but fails to synchronize the mirrored copy at `tools/perf/arch/mips/entry/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl`.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v5 08/13] mips: Get rid of custom mips ABIs for syscall tables ---
commit 0da0a7952278891a02bb3187b7d10490c780e9c7
Author: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 12 17:38:39 2026 +0000

mips: Get rid of custom mips ABIs for syscall tables

This commit replaces the MIPS-exclusive ABI names (n32, o32, n64) with
"common" in the syscall tables. The goal is to simplify and unify the tables
without introducing any functional changes.

> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl
> index 630aab9e54259..9acc68729e218 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl
> @@ -5,384 +5,384 @@
>  # The format is:
>  # <number> <abi> <name> <entry point>
>  #
> -# The <abi> is always "n64" for this file.
> +# The <abi> is always "common" for this file.
>  #
> -0	n64	read				sys_read
> +0	common	read				sys_read

[Severity: Low]
Will this trigger a "Kernel ABI header differences" warning during the perf
build?

The kernel ABI header was modified to use "common" instead of "n64" here, but
it looks like the mirrored copy at 
tools/perf/arch/mips/entry/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl was not synchronized.
When tools/perf/check-headers.sh runs during the perf build, it will detect
that the two files are out of sync.

Should the tools/perf/ copies of the syscall tables be updated in this patch
as well to prevent the build warning?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812-tonyk-syscall_table-v5-0-3d383927c609@igalia.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 17:38 [PATCH v5 00/13] syscalls: Add a shared table for all archs André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] syscalls: Make --abis parsing more robust André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] syscalls: Create unified partial table for all archs André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] scripts/syscall.tbl: Use the common table André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] arm: Use the common syscall table André Almeida
2026-08-12 18:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] s390: " André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] sparc: " André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] mips: Remove duplicated syscallnr.sh André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] mips: Get rid of custom mips ABIs for syscall tables André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:49   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] mips: Use the common syscall table André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] syscalls: Add an option for offsetting the common table André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] alpha: Define entry point for set_mempolicy_home_node syscall André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] alpha: Remove alpha_ prefix from custom syscall entries André Almeida
2026-08-12 17:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 17:38 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] alpha: Use the common syscall table André Almeida
2026-08-12 18:01   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812174956.0A5031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox