Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:22:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812202217.ED50B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812200240.818004-9-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing synchronization for asynchronous reset work during device removal leads to Use-After-Free.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe ---
commit 0bb399a6ce7f9a2aea3f2f595acfac62183158ba
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe

This commit fixes a null pointer dereference in status_show() by checking
if the driver data has been set before proceeding. It also adjusts lock
acquisition during queue probe and simplifies the apqn assignment.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 16779cfc64e87..1edd0b7a3cce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2472,8 +2492,13 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
>  	return ret;
>  
>  err_remove_group:
> +	release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&apdev->device.kobj, &vfio_queue_attr_group);
>  	return ret;
> +
> +err_release_locks:
> +	release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at the rest of 
vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() below this signature, is there a potential
use-after-free if the queue is removed from the host config?

Further down in vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue():

	if (test_bit_inv(apid, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.apm) &&
	    test_bit_inv(apqi, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.aqm)) {
		vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
		flush_work(&q->reset_work);
	} else {
		vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);
	}

done:
	if (matrix_mdev)
		vfio_ap_unlink_queue_fr_mdev(q);

	dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
	kfree(q);

If an administrator hot-unplugs the ap adapter concurrently with a guest
triggering a reset, the queue is no longer in the host's configuration.

Because flush_work(&q->reset_work) is inside the conditional block, it is
skipped in this scenario. The function then proceeds directly to kfree(q).

Could the asynchronous reset worker thread (apq_reset_check) then execute
and dereference the freed q object, resulting in a use-after-free?

Should flush_work(&q->reset_work) be moved outside the condition to ensure
any pending reset work completes before the queue memory is freed?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812200240.818004-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 20:02 [PATCH v5 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 20:54   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 21:12   ` Matthew Rosato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812202217.ED50B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox